Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:05:51.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of the monogenean family Diclidophoridae Fuhrmann, 1928

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. Llewellyn
J. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The family Diclidophoridae Fuhrmann, 1928 has been revised, and the diagnosis of the replacing family Choricotylidae has been given.

2. Keys to the genera and species of the Choricotylidae have been constructed.

3. All species of the family have been reviewed and a diagnosis of each has been given.

4. Species previously referred to the genus Diclidophora have been transferred to the genus Choricotyle.

5. The following taxonomic changes have been proposed:

(a) Choricotyle merlangi (MacCallum, 1917) as a nom. nov. for the ‘Diclidophora merlangi Kuhn, 1829’ described by MacCallum (1917).

(b) Choricotyle charcoti (Dollfus, 1922 a, b) as a n.comb. to replace Cyclo-bothrium charcoti Dollfus, 1922.

(c) Diclidophora ‘species’ Fuhrmann, 1928 as a synonym of Choricotyle charcoti (Dollfus, 1922a, b).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 1941 , pp. 416 - 430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beneden, P. J. van & Hesse, C. E. (1863). Mem. Acad. R. Belg. CI. Sci. 34, 60–146.Google Scholar
Cerfontaine, P. (1896). Arch. Biol 14, 510–60.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. Ph. (1922 a). Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 47, 287–96.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. Ph. (1922 b). Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 47, 348–52.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1928). Handbuch der Zoologie, 2, ii, 1–32.Google Scholar
Gallien, L. (1937). Ann. Parasitol. 15, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, S. (1894). J. Coll. Sci. Tokyo, 8, 1–273.Google Scholar
Kuhn, J. (1829). Mem. Mus. Hist not. 18, 357–68.Google Scholar
Linton, E. (1898). Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 20, 507–48.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1941). Parasitology, 33, 397–405.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. A. (1913a). Z. Bakt. 70, 411–14.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. A. (1913 b). Z. Bakt. 72, 256.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. A. (1917). Zoopathologica, 1, ii, 46–7.Google Scholar
von Nordmann, A.(1832). Mikr. Beit. Naturg. wirb. Thiere, 1 Heft, 1–118. Berlin.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1926). Arch. Naturgesch. 2/3, 1–158.Google Scholar
Sprehn, C. (1933). Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, 24, 1–60.Google Scholar
Yamagtfti, S. (1937). Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan, 19, 1–28. (Published by the author, 25 March 1937.)Google Scholar
Yamagtfti, S. (1938). Jap. J. Zool. 8, i, 15–74.Google Scholar