Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:54:53.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on ascaridoid nematodes in pythons: the life history and development of Polydelphis anoura in Australian pythons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. F. A. Sprent
J. F. A. Sprent
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

P. anoura was found in 55 % of pythons (M. spilotes variegatus) in Brisbane. Eggs contained first stage larvae after 8 days development; the first moult was completed by 10 days; the eggs were infective after 14 days. After ingestion by tadpoles, the larvae hatched from the eggs and migrated into the tissues but did not show any growth. In mice and rats the larvae migrated mainly to the liver, lungs and intestinal wall, where growth occurred to a length of 5–6 mm by 6 months after infection. The second moult was not observed, but the larvae were infective to pythons after 39–42 days development. From their structure it was assumed that after this time the larvae in mouse tissues were third-stage larvae.

Various species of Australian python, Morelia spilotes, Liasis amethistinus, L. fuscus and L. childreni, were experimentally infected with larvae of Polydelphis anoura by feeding nodules from the wall of the small intestine of experimentally infected mice and rats. The third moult occurred in the stomach within 14 days, moulting larvae at this stage measured between 3.5 and 7.0 mm long. Fourth-stage larvae occurred in all python species, the smallest being 4 mm. Growth and development of the fourth stage occurred at first in the oesophagus and stomach. Up to 2 months after infection, larvae had not grown more than 12 mm, yet they were clearly differentiated into males and females. In mouse-infected M. spilotes growth to 20 mm was reached by 154 days, but it was not until 183 days that adults were observed.

Comparison with adult specimens from P. reticulatus from Malaya confirmed the previous observation that Australian male specimens have relatively shorter spicules than male specimens from other geographical regions. Growth, development and location of larvae in mice, experimentally infected with eggs from Australian and Malayan specimens, appeared to be the same.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , June 1970 , pp. 375 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kutzer, E. & Grünberg, W. (1965). Parasitologie und Pathologie der Spulwurmkrankheit der Schlangen. Zentralblatt für Veterinarische Medizin 12, 155–75.Google Scholar
Kutzer, E. & Lamina, J. (1965). Zur Biologie einiger Schlangen-Ascariden. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 25, 211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1959). Observations on the development of Ascaridoid nematodes of the carpet snake. Journal of Parasitology 45 Suppl. 35 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1963). The life history and development of Amplicaecum robertsi, an ascaridoid nematode of the carpet python (Morelia spilotes variegatus). I. Morphology and functional significance of larval stages. Parasitology 53, 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1969 a). Studies on ascaridoid nematodes in pythons: re-definition of Ophidascaris filaria and Polydelphis anoura. Parasitology 59, 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1969 b). Studies on ascaridoid nematodes in pythons: speciation of Ophidascaris in the Oriental and Australian regions. Parasitology 59, 937–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprent, J. F. A. (1970). Studies on ascaridoid nematodes in pythons: life history and development of Ophidascaris moreliae in Australian pythons. Parasitology 60. 97–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed