Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:10:28.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on intrategumental pH and its regulation in adult male Schistosoma mansoni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. A. Pax
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
J. L. Bennett
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

Summary

The intrategumental pH in adult male Schistosoma mansoni as measured with pH-sensitive microelectrodes is between 7.0 and 7.2, a value about one pH unit more alkaline than expected for equilibrium. This value is maintained for at least 4 h after isolation in media buffered with Hepes or CO2/ with or without serum present. CCCP (1 μM) and FCCP (10 μM) cause rapid acidification. DNP (1 mM) and Na-orthovanadate (1 mM) acidify but also cause significant depolarization of the tegument. NH (20 mM) depolarizes and acidifies the tegument with no evidence of transient alkalinization. High K+ (25 mM) accelerates the acidification. Removal of the NH+4 causes a large transient further acidification with recovery requiring as long as 40 min. High K+ (25 mM) delays the early stage of the recovery. Presence of CO2/HCO in the incubation medium does not accelerate the recovery rate nor does SITS (100 μM) inhibit the recovery. Intrategumental Na+ is elevated after an acid load and amiloride (3 mM) as well as low Na+ medium interfere with recovery from the acid load indicating that a Na+–H+ exchanger may be present in the tegumental membrane.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aicken, C. C. & Thomas, R. C. (1977). An investigation of the ionic mechanism of intracellular pH regulation in mouse soleus muscle fibres. Journal of Physiology 272, 295316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boron, W. F. & De Weer, P. (1976). Intracellular pH transients in squid giant axons caused by CO2, NH3 and metabolic inhibitors. Journal of General Physiology 67, 91112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deitmer, J. W. & Schlue, W. R. (1987). The regulation of intracellular pH by identified glial cells and neurones in the central nervous system of the leech. Journal of Physiology 388, 261–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, C. A., Pax, R. A. & Bennett, J. L. (1987). L-glutamine: an amino acid required for maintenance of the tegumental membrane potential of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology 94, 233–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pax, R. A. & Bennett, J. L. (1988). Effect of closantel on intrategumental pH in Schistosoma mansoni and Fasciola hepatica. Journal of Parasitology 75, 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pax, R. A., Chen, G. R. & Bennett, J. L. (1987). Schistosoma mansoni: Measurement of Na+ ion activity in the tegument and extracellular spaces using ion selective microelectrodes. Experimental Parasitology 64, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roos, A. & Boron, W. F. (1981). Intracellular pH. Physiological Reviews 61, 296434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. M. & Boron, W. F. (1982). Intracellular pH regulation in squid giant axons. In Intracellular pH: Its Meaasurement, Regulation and Utilization in Cellular Functions (ed. Nuccitelli, R. & Deamer, D. W.), pp. 221237. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. C. (1984). Experimental displacement of intracellular pH and the mechanism of its subsequent recovery. Journal of Physiology 354, 3P22 P.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, R. C. (1989). Bicarbonate and pHj response. Nature, London 337, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. A. & Wilson, R. A. (1970). The chemical composition of protonephridial canal fluid from the cestode Hymenolepis diminuta. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 35, 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. & Webster, L. A. (1974). Protonephridia. Biological Reviews 49, 127–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed