Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:45:23.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on some New Ophidian and Avian Coccidia from Uganda, with a Revision of the Classification of the Eimeriidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Cecil A. Hoare
Cecil A. Hoare
Affiliation:
Protozoologist to the Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper contains an account of four new Coccidia from Uganda: Caryospora legeri sp.n., from a snake, Psammophis sibilans; Isospora dirumpens sp.n., from a snake, Bitis arietans; Wenyonella africana gen.n., sp.n., from a snake, Boaedon lineatus; and Eimeria urnula sp.n., from a bird, Phalacrocorax carbo lugubris. Eimeria dukei. Lavier 1927, is recorded from a new host, Chaerephon (= Nyctinomus) limbatus (bat).

The characters of the new Coccidia are summarised in the diagnoses (pp. 364, 369, 373, 378). There is a list of all the known species of Isospora found in snakes and lizards. It is noted that I. coelopeltis Galli-Valerio 1926, is actually an Eimeria, and its name is amended to E. coelopeltis. The diagnostic characters of the three species of Caryospora are given in tabular form.

The discovery of a new type of Coccidia, with oocysts containing sixteen sporozoites, divided between two sporocysts in Dorisiella Kay 1930, and between four in Wenyonella gen.n., necessitated a revision of the systematics of the Eimeriidea.

When the genera comprising this suborder (with a few exceptions) are arranged in the ascending order of the number of structural elements (sporocysts and sporozoites) contained in their oocysts, they form parallel series or groups in the horizontal and vertical directions, which consist of homologous members, as represented graphically in Fig. VI (p. 383). The oocyst characters of each genus are determined by those of its four neighbours in the horizontal and vertical groups.

This scheme serves as the basis for the new classification proposed, which is represented in Table III (p. 385). The higher systematic units (subfamilies) are distinguished from each other by the number of sporocysts within the oocyst, while the genera of each subfamily differ from each other in the number of sporozoites within each sporocyst, thus forming a homologous series.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1933 , pp. 359 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butschxi, O. (1882). Sporozoa. In Bronn's Klass. u. Ordn. d. Thier-Reichs, 1, Abt. 1 (Leipzig and Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Carini, A. (1932). Caryospora brasiliensis n.sp., parasita do intestino da cobre verde, Chlorosoma aestivum. Rev. Biol. Hyg. S. Paulo, 3, 85.Google Scholar
Doflein, P. (1916). Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde, 4Aufl. (Jena).Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. (1932). Some parasitic protozoa found in South Africa. S. Afric. Journ. Sci. 29, 627.Google Scholar
Galli-Valebio, B. (1926). Parasitologische Untersuchungen und Beitrage zur parasitolo-gischen Technik. Centralbl. Baht. I. Abt. Orig. 99, 319.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1881). Intorno ad alcuni protisti endoparassitici ed appartenenti alle classe dei flagellati, lobosi, sporozoi e ciliati. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 24, 135.Google Scholar
Hagenmuller, P. (1898). Sur une nouvelle coccidie, parasite du Oongylus ocellatus. C.R. Soc. Biol. 50, 73.Google Scholar
Hagenmuller, P. (1898 a). Sur une nouvelle coccidie diplosporee (Diplospora laverani Hgm.), parasite d'un ophidien. C.R. Soc. Biol. p. 309.Google Scholar
Henby, D. P. (1932). Isospora buteonis sp.nov. from the hawk and owl, and notes on Isospora lacazii (Labbe) in birds. Univ. California Publ. Zool. 37, 291.Google Scholar
Hoare, C. A. (1932). On protozoal blood parasites collected in Uganda. Parasitology, 24, 210.Google Scholar
Labbe, A. (1893). Sur les coccidies des oiseaux. C.R. Acad. Sci. 117, 407.Google Scholar
Labbe, A. (1896). Recherches zoologiques, cytologiques et biologiques sur les coccidies. Arch. Zool. Exp. (3e ser.), 4, 517.Google Scholar
Labbe, A. (1899). Sporozoa. In “Das Tierreich,” 5. Lief. (Berlin).Google Scholar
Lavieb, G. (1927). Eimeria dukei n.sp. Coccidie parasite intestinal de Cheiroptere. C. R. Soc. Biol. 97, 1707.Google Scholar
Leger, L. (1900). Sur le genre Eimeria. C. R. Soc. Biol. 52, 576.Google Scholar
Leger, L. (1904). Protozoaires parasites des viperes (Vipera aspis). Bull, mensuel Assoc. Franc. Avanc. Sciences, No. 9, 268.Google Scholar
Leger, L. (1911). Caryospora simplex, coccidie monosporee et la classification des coccidies. Arch. Protistenk. 22, 71.Google Scholar
Legrb, L. and Hesse, E. (1922). Coccidies d'oiseaux palustres. Le genre Jarrina n.g. C. R. Acad. Sci. 174, 74.Google Scholar
Lerche, M. (1923). Nierencoccidiose bei Häusgansen. Zeitschr. Infektionskr. Haustiere, 25, 122.Google Scholar
Lüthe, M. (1906). Die im Blute schmarotzenden Protozoen und ihre nachsten Verwandten. In Mense's Handb. d. Tropenkrankh. 3 (Anhang, Coccidia, p. 258).Google Scholar
Mesnil, E. (1903). Les travaux récents sur les coccidies. Bull. Inst. Pasteur, 1, 473, 505.Google Scholar
Minchtn, E. A. (1903). The Sporozoa. In Lankester's Treatise on Zoology, Pt. I, Fasc. 2 (London).Google Scholar
Minchtn, E. A. (1912). An introduction to the study of the Protozoa (London).Google Scholar
Pinto, C. (1928). Classification des sporozoaires de la sous-classe Eimeridia. C.R. Soc. Biol. 98, 1571.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1913). Das System der Protozoa. Arch. Protistenk. 30, 125.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Lucet, A. (1890). Une nouvelle maladie parasitaire de l'oie domestique, determinee par des coccidies. C.R. Soc. Biol. 42, 293.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Lucet, A. (1891). Note sur quelques especes des coccidies encore peu etudiees. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 16, 246.Google Scholar
Ray, H. N. (1930). Studies on some Sporozoa in Polychaete worms. II. Dorisiella scolelepidis n.gen., Parasitology, 22, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1921). Die Coccidien. In Handb. Pathogen. Protozoen, 3, 1136 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1929). Doflein's Lehrbuch der Protozoenkunde, 5. Aufl. n. Teil, 2. Halfte (Jena).Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1881). Sur les psorospermes oviformes ou eoccidies, especes nouvelles ou peu connues. Arch. Zool. Exp. 9, 387.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1885). Coccidies nouvelles ou peu connues. Tablettes Zoohgiqties, 1, 4 (Poitiers).Google Scholar
Sergent, ED. (1902). Sur une coccidie nouvelle, parasite du cameleon vulgaire. C.R. Soc. Biol. 54, 1260.Google Scholar
Teipfitt, M. J. (1925). Observations on two new species of coccidia parasitic in snakes. Protozoology, 1, 19 (Suppl. to J. Helminthol.).Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1923). Coccidiosis of cats and dogs and the status of the Isospora of man. Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit. 17, 231.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1926). Protozoology, 2 (London).Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. and Sheather, L. (1925). [Isospora infections of dogs.] Trans. R. Soe. Trop. Med. and Hyg. 19, 10.Google Scholar