Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:29:48.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The susceptibility of fishes to haemoflagellates at different ambient temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. T. K. Woo ,
S. D. Wehnert  and
D. Rodgers
P. T. K. Woo
Affiliation:
Departments of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
S. D. Wehnert
Affiliation:
Departments of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
D. Rodgers
Affiliation:
Departments of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Trout acclimated to 20 °C could not be infected with Cryptobia salmositica. Those acclimated to 5 °C had longer pre-patent periods and considerably lower parasitaemias than those at 10 °C. Forty days after infection, the parasitaemias in fish at 10 °C fluctuated, while this was not observed in those at 5 °C. In vitro incubation of Cryptobia in plasma from 20 °C fish did not affect the motility nor the infectivity of the parasite. Fish infected at 15 °C (low parasitaemias and 2 weeks after inoculation) lost their infections when the ambient temperature was raised to 20 °C. However, in fish with more acute infections (4 weeks after inoculation), the parasitaemias were only substantially reduced when the ambient temperature was raised to 20 °C. Trypanosoma danilewskyi were detected in goldfish acclimated to 10, 20 and 30 °C. However, the parasitaemias in goldfish at 10 and 30 °C were consistently much lower than those at 20 °C.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 385 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archer, R. K. (1965). Haematological Techniques for Use on Animals, pp. 135. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Avtalion, R. R., Wojdani, A., Malik, Z., Shahrabani, R. & Duczyminer, M. (1973). Influence of environmental temperature on the immune response in fish. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 61, 1–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Bower, S. M. & Woo, P. T. K. (1977 a). The morphology and host specificity of Cryptobia catostomi n.sp. (Protozoa: Cryptobiidae) from white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) in southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 55, 1082–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, S. M. & Woo, P. T. K. (1977 b). Cryptobia catostomi: Incubation in plasma of susceptible and refractory fishes. Experimental Parasitology 43, 63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I. E., Gusev, A. V., Dubinina, M. N., Izyumova, N. A., Smirnova, T. S., Sokolovskaya, I. L., Shtein, G. A., Shul'man, S. S. & Epshtein, V. M. (1964). Key to Parasites of Freshwater Fish of the U.S.S.R. (ed. Pavlovskii, E. N.), pp. 919. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Office of Technical Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Ingram, G. A. & Alexander, J. B. (1976). The immune response of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) to injection with soluble antigens. Acta Biologica et Medica Germanica 35, 1561–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, M., Woodey, J. C., Becker, C. D., Woo, P. T. K. & Adams, J. R. (1966). Records of Cryptobia salmositica from sockeye salmon from the Fraser River drainage and from the State of Washington. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 23, 1965–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, R. A. (1977). Susceptibility of marine fish to trypanosomes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 55, 1235–41.Google Scholar
Laveran, A. & Mesnil, F. (1907). Trypanosomes and Trypanosomiasis (Translated into English by Nabarro, D.). London: Baillière.Google Scholar
Letch, C. A. (1979). Host restriction, morphology and isoenzymes among trypanosomes of some British freshwater fishes. Parasitology 79, 107–17.Google Scholar
Lom, J. (1973). Experimental infection of goldfish with blood flagellates. In Progress in Protozoology, Proceedings of the 4th International Congress in Protozoology, p. 255. Clermont-Ferrand, 1973,Université de Clermont.Google Scholar
Lom, J. (1979). Biology offish trypanosomes and trypanoplasms. In Biology of the Kinetoplastida, vol. 2 (ed. Lumsden, W. H. R. and Evans, D. A.), pp. 269–337. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, F. R. (1970). Seasonal fluctuations in the incidence of disease on fish farms. American Fisheries Society Symposium Special Publication 5, 21–9.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. J. (1975). The effect of temperature on disease and their histopathologic manifestations in fish. In The Pathology of Fishes (ed. Ribelin, W. E. and Migaki, G.), pp. 477–96. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Snieszko, S. F. (1974). The effects of environmental stress on outbreaks of infectious diseases of fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 6, 197–208.Google Scholar
Wehnert, S. D. & Woo, P. T. K. (1980). In vivo and in vitro studies on the host specificity of Trypanoplasma salmositica. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 16, 183–7.Google Scholar
Woo, P. T. K. (1969). The haematocrit centrifuge for the detection of trypanosomes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56, 921–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, P. T. K. (1978) The division process of Cryptobia salmositica in experimentally infected rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Canadian Journal of Zoology 56, 1514–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, P. T. K. (1979). Trypanoplasma salmositica: Experimental infections in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Experimental Parasitology 47, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, P. T. K. (1981 a). Acquired immunity against Trypanosoma danilewskyi in goldfish, Carassius auratus. Parasitology 83, 343–6.Google Scholar
Woo, P. T. K. (1981 b). Trypanosoma danilewskyi: A new multiplication process for Trypanosoma (Protozoa: Kinetoplastida). Journal of Parasitology 67, 522–6.Google Scholar