Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:43:54.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ultrastructure of the scolex–neck syncytium, neck cells and frontal gland cells of Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Caryophyllidea: Cestoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

K. Sylvia Richards  and
C. Arme
K. Sylvia Richards
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs. ST5 5BG
C. Arme
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs. ST5 5BG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The syncytium of the scolex and neck regions of Caryophyllaeus laticeps differs from that of the remainder of the body in a number of ways. The microtriches have short shafts and lamellated spines and the surface cytoplasm is characterized by numerous elongated granules, occasional lipid-like bodies and, in the scolex region, is penetrated by ducts from the frontal glands. The elongated granules arise from the tegumentary neck cells and pass into the syncytium via narrow cell processes possessing extensions of the neck cell microtubule system. The granules have a peripheral sub-structure of regularly spaced electron-lucent areas. Evidence suggests that the granular material becomes more diffuse before extrusion. The spherical, lipid-like bodies also arise from the neck cells, but extrusion from the syncytium was not observed. Homology of the neck cells with the tegumentary cells of the rest of the body is discussed. The frontal glands are restricted to the scolex apex and secrete spherical or sub-spherical, homogeneous granules. The cells, with microtubule-lined ducts, open to the surface via pores which possess an electron-dense ring at which point the microtubule system terminates. Sensory bulbs are also present and will be described in a subsequent communication. The inter-relationships of the gland distribution, scolex morphology and host pathology are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 477 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, K. (1975). Ultrastructural studies on Diphyllobothrium ditremum and D. dendriticum (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea), with emphasis on the scolex tegument and the tegument in the area around the genital atrium. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 46, 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arme, C. & Threadgold, L. T. (1976). A unique tegumentary cell type and unicellular glands associated with the scolex of Eubothrium crassum (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea). Rice University Studies 62, 21–34.Google Scholar
Béguin, F. (1966). Etude au microscope électronique de la cuticle et de ses structures associées chez quelques cestodes. Essai d'histologi comparée. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung 72, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bråten, T. (1968). The fine structure of the tegument of Diphyllobothrium latum (L.). A comparison of the plerocercoid and adult stages. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, G. H. & Orr, T. S. C. (1968). Comparative fine structure of outer tegument of Ligula intestinalis and Schistocephalus So1idus. Experimental Parasitology 22, 137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, K. G. & Breckenridge, W. (1967). Neurosecretory cells in a cestode Hymenolepis diminuta. Science 158, 931–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsey, C. H. & Stirewalt, M. A. (1971). Schistosoma mansoni: Fine structure of cercarial acetabular glands. Experimental Parasitology 30, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayunga, E. G. (1979 a). Observations on the intestinal pathology caused by three tapeworms of the white sucker Catostomus commersoni Lacépède. Journal of Fish Diseases 2, 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayunga, E. G. (1979 b). The structure and function of the scolex glands of three caryophyllid tapeworms. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 46, 171–9.Google Scholar
Hayunga, E. G. & Mackiewicz, J. S. (1975). An electron microscope study of the tegument of Hunterella nodulosa Mackiewicz & McCrae 1962 (Cestoidea: Caryophyllidea). International Journal for Parasitology 5, 309–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, G. W. (1930). Studies on the Caryophyllaeidae of North America. Illinois Biological Monographs 11 (1927), 1–186.Google Scholar
Lumsden, R. D., Oaks, J. A. & Mueller, J. F. (1974). Brush border development in the tegument of the tapeworm, Spirometra mansonoides. Journal of Parasitology 60, 209–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackiewicz, J. S. (1968). Vitellogenesis and eggshell formation in Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas) and Caryophyllaeides fennica (Schneider) (Cestoidea: Caryophyllaeidea). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 30, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackiewicz, J. S. (1972). Caryophyllidea (Cestoidea): A review. Experimental Parasitology 31, 417–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackiewicz, J. S., Cosgrove, G. E. & Gude, W. D. (1972). Relationship of pathology to scolex morphology among caryophyllid cestodes. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 39, 233–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mrázek, A. (1901). Über die Larve von Caryophyllaeus mutabilis Rud. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infectionskrankheiten, Erste Abteilung, Originale 29, 485–91.Google Scholar
Öhman-James, C. (1973). Cytology and cytochemistry of the scolex gland cells of Diphyllobothrium ditremum (Creplin 1825). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 42, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortner-Schönbach, P. (1913). Zur Morphologie des Glykogens bei Trematoden und Cestoden. Archiv für Zellforschung 11, 413–49.Google Scholar
Sekutowicz, S. (1934). Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung und Biologie von Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pall.). Mémoires de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres, Série B, Sciences Naturelles 6, 11–26.Google Scholar
Šlais, J. (1961). Damage of the intestinal mucous membrane by tapeworms Aploparaxis furcigera (Rud.) and Hymenolepis parvula (Kowalewski) in ducks. Helminthologia 3, 316–21.Google Scholar
Smyth, J. D. (1971). Development of monozoic forms of Echinococcus granulosus during in vitro culture. International Journal for Parasitology 1, 121–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirewalt, M. A. & Dorsey, C. H. (1974). Schistosoma mansoni: Cercarial penetration of host epidermis at the ultrastructural level. Experimental Parasitology 35, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szidat, L. (1937). Über einige neue Caryophyllaeiden aus ostpreussischen Fischen. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 9, 771–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, H. (1893). Anatomie von Caryophyllaeus mutabilis Rud. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cestoden. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 56, 1–39.Google Scholar
Wiśniewski, L. W. (1930). Das Genus Archigetes R. Leuk. Eine Studie zur Anatomie, Histogenese, Systematik und Biologie. Mémoires de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences et de Lettres, Série B, Sciences Naturelles 2, 1–160.Google Scholar