Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:14:29.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Discussion of Christopher H. Achen and Larry M. Bartels' Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

Neil Roberts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberal democracy is often viewed by its supporters as a system of government that responds to the informed and rational preferences of the public organized as voters. And liberal democracy is often viewed by its critics as a system that fails to respond to the informed and rational preferences of its citizens. In this book Larry Bartels and Chris Achen draw on decades of research to argue that a “realistic” conception of democracy cannot be centered on the idea of a “rational voter,” and that the ills of contemporary democracies, and especially democracy in the U.S., must be sought in the dynamics that link voters, political parties and public policy in ways that reproduce inequality. “We believe,” write the authors, “that abandoning the folk theory of democracy is a prerequisite to both greater intellectual clarity and real political change. Too many democratic reformers have squandered their energy on misguided or quixotic ideas.”

Type
Review Symposium: Elections and Responsive Government
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 154 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher and Bartels, Larry. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher and Bartels, Larry. 2016. “Do Sanders Supporters Favor His Policies?” The New York Times, May 23: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/23/opinion/campaign-stops/do-sanders-supporters-favor-his-policies.html.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1965. On Revolution. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Coates, Ta-Nehisi. 2015. Between the World and Me. New York: Spiegel and Grau.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. L. R. 1993. American Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
James, C. L. R. 2010. A New Notion: Two Works by C.L.R. James. Oakland: PM Press.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2016. Democratic National Convention speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nwdvf1q0jyE.Google Scholar
Roberts, Neil. 2016. “No-Rule: Thinking about Obama v. Trump through Hannah Arendt and C.L.R. James,” Public Seminar, August 4: http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/08/no-rule-thinking-about-obama-v-trump-through-hannah-arendt-and-c-l-r-james/#.V6nlEZOAOkr.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1991. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1998. Redeeming American Political Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar