Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:24:16.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Growth of American Political Development: The View from the Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2005

Rogan Kersh
Rogan Kersh
Affiliation:
Syracuse University's Maxwell School (rtkersh@maxwell.syr.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

American Political Development (APD) is among the fastest-growing areas in political science. Barely two decades ago, the “field” consisted of a handful of works by a few scholars. Since then political scientists have been joined under the APD banner by researchers from other disciplines in issuing dozens of books and hundreds of articles, organizing a biennial APD conference, and teaching numerous graduate and undergraduate courses. The flagship APD journal, Studies in American Political Development, in print since 1986, is ranked among the top political science journals; also well regarded is the Journal of Policy History, begun three years later. The Politics and History section of the American Political Science Association, likewise founded recently, has the eighth largest membership of the discipline's 35 subgroupings. Newly minted PhDs list APD as a specific research and teaching interest, and political science departments are matching that surging interest with job postings. And overviews of recent scholarship on the American polity separately highlight APD approaches. Perhaps inevitably, however, the rapid emergence of APD as a full-fledged disciplinary concentration has been accompanied by developmental problems.Rogan Kersh is associate professor of political science and public administration at Syracuse University's Maxwell School (rtkersh@maxwell.syr.edu). He is the author of Dreams of a More Perfect Union, as well as articles on APD in numerous journals. For helpful advice and commentary, the author thanks Brian Balogh, Dan Galvin, Jennifer Hochschild, Shelley Hurt, David Mayhew, Suzanne Mettler, Sid Milkis, Jim Morone, three anonymous Perspectives reviewers, and audience members at the APD workshop at the University of Virginia's Miller Center.

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 335 - 345
Copyright
© 2005 American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amenta, Edwin. 1998. Bold relief: Institutional politics and the origins of modern American social policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Balogh, Brian. 2003. The state of the state among historians. Social Science History 27 (3): 455–63.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles. 1913. An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.
Beard, Charles. 1934. The historical approach to the New Deal. American Political Science Review 34 (1): 11–15.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard Franklin. 1984. Sectionalism and American political development, 1880–1980. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bensel, Richard Franklin. 1990. Yankee leviathan: The origins of central state authority in America, 1859–1877. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bensel, Richard Franklin. 2003. The tension between American political development as a research community and as a disciplinary subfield. Studies in American Political Development 17 (1): 103–6.Google Scholar
Burgess, John. 1901. The Civil War and the Constitution, 1859–1865. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Carpenter, Daniel P., and Keith Whittington. 2003. Executive power in American institutional development. Perspectives on Politics 1 (3): 495–513.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., and Micheal W. Giles. 2003. Journals in the discipline: A report on a new survey of American political scientists. PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (2): 293–308.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 1998. Party ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gerring, John. 2003. APD from a methodological point of view. Studies in American Political Development 17 (1): 82–102.Google Scholar
Glenn, Brian J. 2004. The two schools of American political development. Political Studies Review 2 (2): 153–65.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie. 2000. The shadow welfare state: Labor, business, and the politics of health care in the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Greene, Jack P. 1968. The reappraisal of the American Revolution in recent historical literature. In The reinterpretation of the American Revolution, 1763–1789, ed. Jack P. Greene, 2–75. New York: Harper and Row.
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The liberal tradition in America. New York: Harcort, Brace, and World.
John, Richard. 1997. Governmental institutions as agents of change: Rethinking American political development in the Early Republic, 1787–1835. Studies in American Political Development 11 (2): 347–80.Google Scholar
Jones, Henry Ford. 1898. The rise and growth of American politics: A sketch of constitutional development. New York: Macmillan.
Kahn, Charles H., ed. 1979. The art and thought of Heraclitus: An edition of the fragments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katznelson, Ira, and Martin Shefter, eds. 2002. Shaped by war and trade: International influences on American political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kromkowski, Charles A. 2002. Recreating the American republic: Rules of apportionment, constitutional change, and American political development, 1700–1870. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kurzer, Paulette. 2003. Studying democracy and teaching classics: What is happening in the field of comparative politics? Perspectives on Politics 1 (2): 373–78.Google Scholar
Landy, Marc, and Sidney M. Milkis. 2004. American government: Balancing democracy and rights. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lieberman, Robert C., 1998. Shifting the color line: Race and the American welfare state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Little, Richard. 1991. International relations and the methodological turn. Political Studies 39 (3): 463–78.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
Luong, Paula Jones, and Erika Weinthal. 2004. Contra coercion: Russian tax reform, exogenous shocks, and negotiated institutional change. American Political Science Review 98 (1): 139–52.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry. 2001. Is democracy impossible? Riker's mistaken accounts of antebellum politics. Paper presented at Public Choice Society meetings, San Antonio.
Mayhew, David R. 2005. Wars and American politics. Perspectives on Politics 3 (3).Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2002. Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1994. U.S. policy waves in comparative context. In New perspectives on American politics, ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Calvin Jillson, 325–40. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Mettler, Suzanne. 1998. Dividing citizens: Gender and federalism in New Deal public policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Milkis, Sidney M. 1993. The president and the parties: The transformation of the American party system since the New Deal. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morone, James A. 1990. The democratic wish: Popular participation and the limits of American government. New York: Basic Books.
Morone, James A. 2003. Hellfire nation: The politics of sin in American history. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated feudalism: Labor, the law, and liberal development in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 1994. Beyond the iconography of order: Notes for a “new institutionalism.” In The dynamics of American politics: Approaches and interpretations, ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Calvin Jillson, 311–30. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.
Orren, Karen, and Stephen Skowronek. 2004. The search for American political development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–68.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004a. APD's Faustian bargain. Clio 14 (1): 1–2, 7.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004b. Politics in time: History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Polsby, Nelson W., and Eric Schickler. 2004. Landmarks in the study of Congress since 1945. In The evolution of political knowledge: Theory and inquiry in American politics, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Richard Sisson, 163–90. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Polsky, Andrew. 1991. The rise of the therapeutic state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1998. Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1999. Roots of reform: Farmers, workers, and the American state, 1877–1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed pluralism: Institutional innovation and the development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shapiro, Ian. 2002. Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or What's wrong with political science and what to do about it.” Political Theory 30 (4): 588–611.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Skocpol, Theda, and Paul Pierson, eds. N.d. The transformation of American politics: Policies, institutions, and participation. Unpublished manuscript.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen. 2003. What's wrong with APD? Studies in American Political Development 17 (1): 107–110.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1993. Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The multiple traditions in America. American Political Science Review 87 (3): 549–66.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1996. Science, non-science, and politics: On turns to history in political science. In The historic turn in the human sciences, ed. Terry McDonald, 119–60. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 2003. Substance and methods in APD research. Studies in American Political Development 17 (1): 111–15.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 2004. Reconnecting political theory to empirical inquiry, or A return to the cave?” In Evolution of political knowledge, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Richard Sisson, 60–88. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Wood, Gordon S. 2004. Free to be you and me: Review of Freedom just around the corner, by Walter A. McDougall. New York Times Book Review, March 28.
Zelizer, Julian E. 1998. Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the state, 1945–1975. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zelizer, Julian E. 2003. Stephen Skowronek's Building a new American state and the origins of American political development. Social Science History 27 (3): 425–41.Google Scholar