Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:53:28.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ten Misconceptions Concerning Neurobiology and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2013

John R. Hibbing
John R. Hibbing*
Affiliation:
Political Physiology Lab, University of Nebraska–Lincoln (unl.edu/polphyslab)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political science is far behind the other social science disciplines in incorporating neurobiological concepts, techniques, and theory. In recent years progress has been made in closing this gap but many in the political science mainstream view the movement with concern or even horror. Though a healthy dose of skepticism is appropriate and beneficial to the scientific endeavor, negative reactions to viewing politics through a neurobiological lens are often based on fundamental misconceptions regarding both neurobiology and politics. In this Reflections essay, I address ten of these misconceptions, including the beliefs that biology is deterministic, reductionist, unnecessary, irrelevant, normatively dangerous, and ideologically biased. The goal is to encourage a constructive dialogue on the relevance of neurobiology to political life—a dialogue that would in turn improve research in the fledgling subfield and lead to innovations in political science by encouraging new ways of conceptualizing and analyzing the variables at the discipline's core.

Type
Reflections
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 475 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Joshua M., Nocera, Christopher C., and Bargh, John A.. 2010. “Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions.” Science 328(5986): 1712–15.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L., and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?” American Political Science Review 99(2): 153–67.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kristen, Wagner, Michael, Jacobs, Carly M., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, John R.. 2012. “Beyond Survey Self-Reports: Using Physiology to Tap Political Orientations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Chicago, July 6–9.Google Scholar
Barker, David C., and Tinnick, James D.. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constraint.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Jonah, Meredith, Marc, and Wheeler, S. Christion. 2008. “Contextual Priming: Where People Vote Affects How They Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105(26): 8846–49.Google Scholar
Block, Jack, and Block, Jeanne H.. 2006. “Nursery School Personality and Political Orientation Two Decades Later.” Journal of Research in Personality 40(5): 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaert, Anthony F. 2006. “Biological versus Nonbiological Older Brothers and Men's Sexual Orientation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(28): 10771–74.Google Scholar
Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Barbaranelli, Claudio, and Zimbardo, Phillip G.. 1999. “Personality Profiles and Political Parties.” Political Psychology 20(1): 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, Dana R., Jost, John T., Gosling, Samuel D., and Potter, J.. 2008. “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind.” Political Psychology 29(6): 807–40.Google Scholar
Carraro, Luciana, Castelli, Luigi, and Macchiella, C.. 2011. “The Automatic Conservative: Ideology-Based Attentional Asymmetries in the Processing of Valenced Information.” PLoS ONE 6(11): e26456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026456.Google Scholar
Caspi, Avshalom, Sugden, Karen, Moffitt, Terrie E., Taylor, Alan, Craig, Ian W., Harrington, Honalee, McClay, Joseph, Mill, Jonathan, Martin, Judy, Braithwaite, Antony, and Poulton, Richie. 2003. Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene.” Science 18(July): 386–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan. 2008. “Genes and Ideologies.” Perspectives on Politics 6(2): 299–320.Google Scholar
Charney, Evan, and English, William. 2012. “Candidate Genes and Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review 106(1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Cochran, Gregory, and Harpending, Henry. 2009. The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., and Hamrick, N.. 2003. “Stable Individual Differences in Physiological Response to Stressors.” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 17: 407–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, Michael D., Balzer, Amanda, Jacobs, Carly M., Gruszczynski, Michael W., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, John R.. 2012. “The Political Left Rolls with the Good; The Political Right Confronts the Bad.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 367(1589): 640–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, Michael D., Hibbing, John R., and Smith, Kevin B.. 2011. “The Politics of Attention: Gaze Cuing Effects Are Moderated by Political Temperament.” Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 73(1): 24–9.Google Scholar
Eagleman, David M. 2011. Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G. 2010. “Theory Trouble: The Case of Biopolitical Science.” Austrian Journal of Political Science 2010(1): 55–71.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003a. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24(1): 41–74.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003b. “Values, Ideology, and the Structure of Political Attitudes.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, J.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102(2): 233–48.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Dawes, Cristopher T.. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 79(3): 579–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Schreiber, Darren. 2008. “Biology, Politics, and the Emerging Science of Human Nature.” Science 322: 912–14.Google Scholar
French, Jeffrey A., Smith, Kevin B., Guck, Adam, Alford, John R., Birnie, Andrew K., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011. “The Stress of Politics: Endocrinology and Voter Participation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Istanbul, July 9–12.Google Scholar
Galdi, Silvia, Arcuri, Luciana, and Gawronski, Bertram. 2008. “Automatic Mental Associations Predict Future Choices of Undecided Decision-makers.” Science 321(5892): 1100–102.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Schachar, Ron. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47(3): 540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Ha, Shang. 2010. “Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 111–33.Google Scholar
Golec, Aleksandra. 2002. “Need for Cognitive Closure and Political Conservatism: Studies of the Relationship.” Polish Psychological Bulletin 33: 5–12.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5): 1029–46.Google Scholar
Hammock, Elizabeth A.D., and Young, Larry J.. 2002. “Variation in the Vasopressin V1a Receptor Promoter and Expression: Implications for Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Social Behavior.” European Journal of Neuroscience 16: 399–402.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K, and McDermott, Rose. 2011. Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Medland, Sara, Morley, Kate, Heath, Anthony C., and Martin, Nicholas G.. 2007. “The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study.” Behavior Genetics 37(3): 435–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helzer, Erik G., and Pizarro, David A.. 2011. “Dirty Liberals! Reminders of Physical Cleanliness Influence Moral and Political Attitudes.” Psychological Science 22(4): 517–22.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, Jordan B., DeYoung, Colin G., Xu, Xiaowen, and Peterson, Jordan B.. 2010. “Compassionate Liberals and Polite Conservatives: Associations of Agreeableness with Political Ideology and Moral Values.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(5): 655–64.Google Scholar
Huizenga, Nannett A.T.M., Koper, Jan W., de Lange, Peiter, Pols, Huibert A.R., Stolk, Ronald P., Grobbee, Diederick E., de Jong, Frank H., and Lamberts, Steven W.J.. 1998. “Interperson Variability but Intraperson Stability of Baseline Plasma Cortisol Concentrations, and Its Relation to Feedback Sensitivity of the HPA Axis to a Low Dose of Dexamethasone in Elderly Individuals.” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 83(1): 47–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., and Bloom, Paul. 2009. “Conservatives are More Easily Disgusted than Liberals.” Cognition and Emotion 23(4): 714–25.Google Scholar
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., and Bloom, Paul. 2012. “Disgusting Smells Cause Decreased Liking of Gay Men.” Emotion 12(1): 23–27.Google Scholar
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., Knobe, J., and Bloom, Paul. 2009. “Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays.” Emotion 9(3): 435–39.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 169–84.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics 71(3): 782–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan. 2003. “Bounded Rationality in Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Theory 13: 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T. 2006. “The End of the End of Ideology.” American Psychologist 61(7): 651–70.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., and Amodio, David M.. 2011. “Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence.” Motivation and Emotion 36(1): 55–64.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–75.Google Scholar
Kaminsky, Zachary A., et al. 2009. “DNA Methylation Profiles in Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins.” Nature Genetics 41: 240–45.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80(2): 505–20.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2005. “The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 26(3): 455–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Eleanor A., Woollett, Katharine, and Spiers, Hugo J.. 2006. “London Taxi Drivers and Bus Drivers: A Structural MRI and Neuropsychological Analysis.” Hippocampus 16: 1091–101.Google Scholar
Marcus, George W., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D., and Coplan, Myron S.. 1999. “Water Treatment with Silicofluorides and Lead Toxicity.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 56(4): 435–49.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Herbert. 1958. “Conservatism and Personality.” American Political Science Review 52(1): 27–45.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2004. “The Feeling of Rationality: The Meaning of Neuroscientific Advances for Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 691–706.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 2010. Personality and the Foundations of Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxley, Douglas R., Smith, Kevin B., Alford, John R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Miller, Jennifer L., Scalora, Mario, Hatemi, Peter K., and Hibbing, John R.. 2008. “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science 321(5896): 1667–70.Google Scholar
Petersen, Michael Bang. 2009. “Public Opinion and Evolved Heuristics: The Role of Category-Based Inference.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 9(3): 367–89.Google Scholar
Pinker, Stephen. 2002. The Blank Slate. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Piurko, Yuval, Schwartz, Shalom H., and Davidov, Eldad. 2011. “Basic Personal Values and the Meaning of Left-Right Political Orientations in 20 Countries.” Political Psychology 32(40): 537–61.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Prescott, Carol A., Johnson, Ronald C., and McArdle, John J.. 1999. “Chorion Type as a Possible Influence on the Results and Interpretation of Twin Study Data.” Twin Research 2(December): 244–49.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2010. “You've Either Got It or You Don't? The Stability of Political Interest Over the Life Cycle.” Journal of Politics 72(3): 747–66.Google Scholar
Rutchick, Andrew M. 2010. “Deus ex Machina: The Influence of Polling Place on Voting Behavior.” Political Psychology 31(2): 209–25.Google Scholar
Schnall, Simone, Haidt, Jonathan, Clore, Gerald L., and Jordan, Alexander H.. 2008. “Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(8): 1096–109.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 2006. Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language and Political Power. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Settle, Jaime E., Dawes, Christopher T., Christakis, Nicholas A., and Fowler, James H.. 2010. “Friendships Moderate an Association between Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology.” Journal of Politics 72(4): 1189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigelman, Lee. 2006. “Report of the Editor of the American Political Science Review, 2004–5.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39(1): 171–73.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A, 1991. “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning.” Organizational Science 2: 125–34.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011a. “Disgust Sensitivity and the Neurophysiology of Left-right Political Orientations.” PLoS ONE 6(10): e25552.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011b. “Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology.” Political Psychology 32(3): 369–97.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Peterson, Stephen A.. 1997. Darwinism, Dominance, and Democracy: The Biological Bases of Authoritarianism. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Peterson, Stephen A.. 1998. “Biopolitics after Three Decades—A Balance Sheet. British Journal of Political Science 28(3): 559–71.Google Scholar
Suhay, Elizabeth, and Jayaratne, Toby Epstein. 2012. “When Does Biology Justify Ideology? Political Ideology and the ‘Nature v. Nurture’ Debate.” Unpublished manuscript, Lafayette College.Google Scholar
Tesser, Abraham. 1993. “The Importance of Heritability in Psychological Research: The Case of Attitudes.” Psychological Review 100: 129–42.Google Scholar
Theodoridis, Alexander, and Nelson, Amy J.. 2012. “Of BOLD Claims and Excessive Fears.” Political Psychology 33(1): 27–43.Google Scholar
Vigil, Jacob M. 2010. “Political Leanings Vary with Facial Expression Processing and Psychosocial Functioning.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 13(5): 547–58.Google Scholar
Walum, Hasse, Westberg, Lars, Henningsson, Susanne, Neiderhiser, Jenae M., al, David Ross et. 2008. “Genetic Variation in the Vasopressin Receptor 1a Gene (AVPR1A) Associates with Pair bonding Behavior in Humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(37): 14153–56.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Thalia, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2005. “Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe.” Psychological Science 16: 780–84.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1998. Conscilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar