Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:43:38.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology, Politics, Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2013

William E. Connolly
William E. Connolly*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University. E-mail: pluma@jhu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I share the view that biocultural connections should become more central to political inquiry. And I appreciate some of the themes Hibbing develops. The approach considered in this response is one in which variable degrees of agency are pushed deeply into simple organisms, into processes of embryological unfolding, and into subliminal elements of cultural relations. Such an approach appreciates the creative element in evolution as well as in subliminal processes in play within and between us. Several practitioners of complexity theory in biology have been exploring such routes. They may contribute to a more layered set of interfaces between biology and cultural interpretation that are even less reductionist in character. And they may carry import for explorations of how the media work on the visceral register of intersubjectivity, still to be developed.

Type
Reflection Response
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 508 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berk, Gerald, Galvan, Dennis, and Hattam, Victoria. Forthcoming. Unstructuring Politics: New Perspectives on Institutional Diversity and Change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 2006. “Experience and Experiment.” Daedalus 135(3): 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E. 2013. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, Democratic Activism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence W. 2012. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Brian. 1994. How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1909. A Pluralistic Universe. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart. 2008. Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason, and Religion. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Margulis, Lynn, and Sagan, Dorion. 1993. What Is Life? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. 2003. “Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change and American Political Thought.” Studies in American Political Development 17(2): 185–203.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., ed. 1997. Sleeping, Dreaming and Dying: An Exploration of Consciousness with the Dalai Lama. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1978. Process and Reality, Corrected ed.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar