Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:15:27.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Physical and Social Facts in Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

J. A. Barnes
J. A. Barnes*
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his recent paper Gellner singles me out for special comment and some reply is called for. He attributes to me several propositions which he says I made in my note on ‘Physical and social kinship’ in this journal, and he then refutes them. Reading his paper I cannot avoid thinking that he exaggerates the differences between us, thereby apparently strengthening his argument. Some substantial differences there are, but others are fictional. A line-by-line analysis of what he says about me in his paper might be amusing but would be of only ephemeral interest. In this reply I confine myself to a few important issues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , July 1964 , pp. 294 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 by Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Arnholm, C. J., Familierett. 3rd ed. (Oslo: Johan Grundt Tanum 1958).Google Scholar
[2] Barnes, J. A., “Kinship”, Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
[3] Barnes, J. A., “Physical and social kinship”, Philosophy of science, 28, 1961, pp. 296–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Gellner, Ernest, “The concept of kinship”, Philosophy of science, 27, 1960, pp. 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Gellner, Ernest, “Nature and society in social anthropology”, Philosophy of science, 30, 1963, pp. 236–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Malinowski, Bronislaw, The family among the Australian Aborigines, Rev. ed. (New York: Schocken Books, 1963).Google Scholar
[7] Needham, Rodney, “Descent systems and ideal language”, Philosophy of Science, 27, 1960, pp. 96–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Stanner, W. E. H., Personal communication.Google Scholar