Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T13:06:33.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Herbert A. Simon
Herbert A. Simon*
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is often claimed that there can be no such thing as a logic of scientific discovery, but only a logic of verification. By ‘logic of discovery’ is usually meant a normative theory of discovery processes. The claim that such a normative theory is impossible is shown to be incorrect; and two examples are provided of domains where formal processes of varying efficacy for discovering lawfulness can be constructed and compared. The analysis shows how one can treat operationally and formally phenomena that have usually been dismissed with fuzzy labels like ‘intuition’ and ‘creativity’.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 1973 , pp. 471 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

This research has been supported by a Public Health Service Grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, and by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which is monitored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. I am indebted to Nicholas Rescher for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

[1] Buchanan, B. G. Logics of Scientific Discovery, A. I. Memo 47, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 1966.Google Scholar
[2] Hanson, N. R. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
[3] Nilsson, N. J. Problem-Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
[4] Popper, K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson and Company, 1959.Google Scholar
[5] Simon, H. A. and Kotovsky, K. “Human Acquisition of Concepts for Serial Patterns.” Psychological Review 70 (1963): 534–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Simon, H. A. “On Judging the Plausibility of Theories.” in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Vol. III. Edited by B. Van Rootselar and J. F. Staal. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1968.Google Scholar
[7] Simon, H. A. “The Theory of Problem Solving.” Information Processing 71 (1972).Google Scholar
[8] Simon, H. A. and Lea, G. “Problem Solving and Rule Induction: a Unified View.” (To be published in Proceedings of the Ninth Carnegie-Mellon Symposium on Cognition. Edited by L. W. Gregg.)Google Scholar