Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:16:07.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Einstein's Discovery of Special Relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Gary Gutting
Gary Gutting*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the controversy between philosophers of science (e.g. Grünbaum) and historians of science (e.g. Holton) regarding Einstein's discovery of STR. Although Holton is surely correct on the historical point that experimental results (especially the Michelson–Morley experiment) had little influence on Einstein's development of STR, this fact is not sufficient to establish his (and Polanyi's) claim that major scientific discoveries are primarily matters of private, nonspecifiable insights into physical reality. It is possible that Einstein's work was based primarily on non-empirical but nonetheless publicly discussable, objective considerations. And a more comprehensive survey of the discovery of STR shows that this was indeed the case and thus excludes STR as a supporting instance of Holton's and Polanyi's assertions of the primacy of “private science.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 1972 , pp. 51 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Adler, R., Bazin, M., and Schiffer, M. Introduction to General Relativity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
[2] Einstein, A. Relativity: The Special and General Theory. New York: Holt, 1921.Google Scholar
[3] Einstein, A. Essays in Science. New York: Philosophical Library, 1934.Google Scholar
[4] Einstein, A. “Autobiographical Notes.” Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Edited by Schilpp, by P. A. New York: Harper and Row, 1959.Google Scholar
[5] Grünbaum, A. “The Genesis of the Special Theory of Relativity.” Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
[6] Grünbaum, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1963.Google Scholar
[7] Grünbaum, A. “The Bearing of Philosophy on the History of Science.” Science 143 (1964).10.1126/science.143.3613.1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Hanson, N. R. “Is There a Logic of Discovery.” Current Issues in the Philosphy of Science. Edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
[9] Hempel, C. G. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
[10] Hesse, M. Models and Analogies in Science. London: 1963.Google Scholar
[11] Holton, G. “The Origins of the Special Theory of Relativity.” American Journal of Physics 28 (1960).10.1119/1.1935922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Holton, G. “Einstein, Michelson, and the ‘Crucial’ Experiment.” Isis 60 (1969).10.1086/350468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Keswani, G. H. “Origin and Concept of Relativity.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (1965).10.1093/bjps/XV.60.286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Körner, S. Conceptual Thinking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
[15] Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
[16] Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
[17] Polanyi, M. “Notes on Professor Grünbaum's Observations.” Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
[18] Rosenthal-Schneider, I. “Presuppositions and Anticipations in Einstein's Physics.” Albert Einsein: Philosopher – Scientist. Edited by Schilpp, P. A. New York: Harper and Row, 1959.Google Scholar
[19] Rudner, R. et. al. “Panel Discussion of Simplicity of Scientific Theories.” Philosophy of Science 28 (1961): 109–171.10.1086/287793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Wertheimer, M. Productive Thinking. Enlarged edition. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1959.Google Scholar