Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:31:07.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Essay Review: Debunking Adapting Minds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Edouard Machery  and
H. Clark Barrett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

David Buller's recent book, Adapting Minds, is a philosophical critique of the field of evolutionary psychology. Buller argues that evolutionary psychology is utterly bankrupt from both a theoretical and an empirical point of view. Although Adapting Minds has been well received in both the academic press and the popular media, we argue that Buller's critique of evolutionary psychology fails.

Type
Essay Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 232 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

We would like to thank Luc Faucher, Martie Haselton, Steve Stich, and the participants of the seminar Evolution and Cognition at the University of Pittsburgh in Fall 2005, particularly Peter Gildenhuys and Devan Goldstein, for their comments on previous versions of this critical review. Thanks also to Dale Purves and Gary Marcus for answering a few questions about brain development.

References

Barrett, H. Clark (2005), “Adaptations to Predators and Prey”, in Buss, David M. (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 200–223.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. Clark, and Kurzban, Robert (2006), “Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate”, Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate 113:628–647.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Silk, Joan B. (1999), How Humans Evolved. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Brown, Donald E. (1991), Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Buss, David M. (1989), “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures”, Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures 12:1–49.Google Scholar
Buss, David M., ed. (2005), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Buss, David M., and Haselton, Martie (2005), “The Evolution of Jealousy”, The Evolution of Jealousy 9:506–507.Google ScholarPubMed
Buss, David M., Larsen, Randy J., Westen, Drew, and Semmelroth, Jennifer, (1992), “Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology”, Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology 3:251–255.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda, Tooby, John, Fiddick, Laurence, and Bryant, Gregory A. (2005), “Detecting Cheaters”, Detecting Cheaters 9:505–506.Google ScholarPubMed
Crume, Tessa L., DiGuiseppi, Carolyn, Byers, Tim, Sirotnak, Andrew P., and Garrett, Carol J. (2002), “Underascertainment of Child Maltreatment Fatalities by Death Certificates, 1990–1998”, Underascertainment of Child Maltreatment Fatalities by Death Certificates, 1990–1998 110: e18.Google ScholarPubMed
Daly, Martin, and Wilson, Margo (1988), Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Daly, Martin, and Wilson, Margo (1999), The Truth about Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Martin, and Wilson, Margo (2005), “The Cinderella Effect Is No Fairy Tale”, The Cinderella Effect Is No Fairy Tale 9:507–508.Google ScholarPubMed
Daly, Martin, and Wilson, Margo (2006), “Reply to David Buller by Martin Daly & Margo Wilson”, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Delton, Andrew W., Robertson, Theresa F., and Kenrick, Douglas T. (2006), “The Mating Game Isn't Over: A Reply to Buller's Critique of the Evolutionary Psychology of Mating”, The Mating Game Isn't Over: A Reply to Buller's Critique of the Evolutionary Psychology of Mating 4:262–273.Google Scholar
Duchaine, Bradley C., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John (2001), “Evolutionary Psychology and the Brain”, Evolutionary Psychology and the Brain 11:225–230.Google ScholarPubMed
Edelman, Gerald M. (1987), Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. (1983), The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J., and Lewontin, Richard C. (1979), “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm”, The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm 205:581–598.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joe, and Gil-White, Francisco J. (2001), “The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission”, The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission 22:165–196.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, Hillard S., Hill, Kim R., Lancaster, Jane B., and Hurtado, A. Magdalena (2000), “A Theory of Human Life History Evolution: Diet, Intelligence, and Longevity”, A Theory of Human Life History Evolution: Diet, Intelligence, and Longevity 9:156–185.Google Scholar
Kurland, Jeffrey A., and Gaulin, Steven J. C. (2005), “Cooperation and Conflict among Kin”, in Buss, David M. (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 447–482.Google Scholar
Kurzban, Robert, Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda (2001), “Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization”, Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization 98:15387–15392.Google ScholarPubMed
Machery, Edouard (forthcoming), “Discovery and Confirmation in Evolutionary Psychology”, in Prinz, Jesse (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F. (2004), The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates the Complexities of Human Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Öhman, Arne, and Mineka, Susan (2001), “Fears, Phobias, and Preparedness: Toward an Evolved Module of Fear and Fear Learning”, Fears, Phobias, and Preparedness: Toward an Evolved Module of Fear and Fear Learning 108:483–522.Google ScholarPubMed
Piazza, Manuela, and Dehaene, Stanislas (2004), “From Number Neurons to Mental Arithmetic: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Number Sense”, in Gazzaniga, Michael S. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences III. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 865–876.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (1997), How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Purves, Dale, White, Leonard E., and Riddle, David R. (1996), “Is Neural Development Darwinian?”, Is Neural Development Darwinian? 19:460–464.Google ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., and Blakeslee, Sandra (1998), Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck (2006), “Genes, Brain, and Cognition: A Roadmap for the Cognitive Scientist”, Genes, Brain, and Cognition: A Roadmap for the Cognitive Scientist 101:247–269.Google ScholarPubMed
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert (2004), Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan (1994), “The Modularity of Thought and the Epidemiology of Representations”, in Hirschfield, Lawrence and Gelman, Susan (eds.), Mapping the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, Robert L. (1972), “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection”, in B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago: Aldine, 136–179.Google Scholar
Verhage, Matthijs, Maia, Ascanio S., Plomp, Jaap J., Brussaard, Arjen B., Heeroma, Joost H., Vermeer, Hendrika, Toonen, Ruud F., Hammer, Robert E., van den Berg, Timo K., Missler, Markus, Geuze, Hans J., and Südhof, Thomas C. (2000), “Synaptic Assembly of the Brain in the Absence of Neurotransmitter Secretion”, Synaptic Assembly of the Brain in the Absence of Neurotransmitter Secretion 287:864–869.Google ScholarPubMed