Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:26:15.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

General Ontology and the Principle of Acquaintance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Kenneth C. Clatterbaugh
Kenneth C. Clatterbaugh*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What one is acquainted with has always been important for the rejection or acceptance of any ontological description. Yet the relevance of acquaintance to ontology has not always been clearly stated. Some philosophers have held that they were acquainted with the simple entities of ontological analysis. They also held that if they were not acquainted with such entities, their analysis would be inadequately supported. In this paper I argue that acquaintance with ontological simples cannot be a reason for accepting or rejecting any ontological analysis. At the same time, I examine what I believe to be the relevance of acquaintance to ontological description.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , July 1965 , pp. 272 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Allaire, Edwin B., “Bare Particulars,” Philosophical Studies, vol. 14, January-February 1963, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bergmann, Gustav, “Comments on Professor Hempel's ‘The Concept of Cognitive Significance',” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 80, July 1951, pp. 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bergmann, Gustav, “Strawson's Ontology,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 57, September 1960, pp. 601–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Bergmann, Gustav, “Synthetic A Priori,” Logic and Reality (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1964), pp. 272–301.Google Scholar
[5] Russell, Bertrand, The Problems of Philosophy (London: Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar