No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Glymour's “bootstrap” account of confirmation is designed to provide an analysis of evidential relevance, which has been a serious problem for hypothetico-deductivism. As set out in Theory and Evidence, however, the “bootstrap” condition allows confirmation in clear cases of evidential irrelevance. The difficulties with Glymour's account seem to be due to a basic feature which it shares with hypothetico-deductive accounts, and which may explain why neither can give a satisfactory analysis of evidential relevance.
I would like to thank Paul Horwich, an anonymous referee, and especially Richard Healey for helpful discussions and/or comments on earlier drafts of this paper.