Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:44:26.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Models, Theories, and Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

A. V. Bushkovitch*
Affiliation:
Saint Louis University

Extract

A large number of definitions of the concept “model” have been given by various authors in recent years. Thirty-seven definitions are listed by A. I. Uyemov in a recent monograph (see [9]). This list is somewhat one-sided since it contains a disproportionate number of references to the work of Soviet authors. However, most of the important definitions given by Western writers are included. I shall give three definitions, all of great generality, so that various types of models, replicas, maps, theories and, most importantly, cybernetic models, are included. The advantage of this high degree of generality, or all-inclusiveness, is that the task of the investigator of uses of models in science, is reduced to classifying the various types of models, their construction, function, and structure, thus avoiding indecisive arguments (historically important, of course) such as the Duhem–Campbell controversy, so perceptively discussed by Mary Hesse ([2], [3]).

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Benacerraf, P.God, the Devil, and Gödel.” Monist 51 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Hesse, M. B. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.Google Scholar
[3] Hesse, M. B. Forces and Fields. Totowa, New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1965.Google Scholar
[4] Kant, I. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn. New York: Wiley Book Co., 1943.Google Scholar
[5] Lucas, J.Minds, Machines, and Gödel.” in Minds and Machines. Edited by Anderson, A. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1964.Google Scholar
[6] Minsky, M.Matter, Mind, and Models.” in Semantic Information Processing. Edited by Minsky, M. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, 1968.Google Scholar
[7] Morozov, K. E. Mathematical Modeling in Science. Moscow, 1969. (in Russian)Google Scholar
[8] Raphael, B.Semantic Information Retrieval.” In [6].Google Scholar
[9] Uyemov, A. I. Logical Foundations of the Modeling Method. Moscow, 1971. (in Russian)Google Scholar
[10] Webb, J.Metamathematics and the Philosophy of Mind.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1970).Google Scholar