Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:55:53.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Objects or Events?: Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Andreas Bartels*
Affiliation:
University of Paderborn
*
Universität-GH Paderborn, Fachbereich 1—Philosophie, Warburger Straβe 100, D-33095 Paderborn, Germany.

Abstract

The recent work of Paul Teller and Sunny Auyang in the philosophy of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has stimulated the search for the fundamental entities in this theory. In QFT, the classical notion of a particle collapses. The theory does not only exclude classical, i.e., spatiotemporally identifiable particles, but it makes particles of the same type conceptually indistinguishable. Teller and Auyang have proposed competing ersatz-ontologies to account for the ‘loss of particles’: field quanta vs. field events. Both ontologies, however, suffer from serious defects. While quanta lack numerical identity, spatiotemporal localizability, and independence of basis-representations, events—if understood as concrete measurement events—are related to the theory only statistically. I propose an alternative solution: The entities of QFT are events of the type ‘Quantum system, S, is in quantum state, Ψ‘. These are not point events, but Davidsonian events, i.e., they can be identified by their location within the causal net of the world.

Type
Foundations of Statistical Physics, Spacetime Theories, and Quantum Field Theory
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am very grateful to Sunny Auyang, Paul Teller, and Richard Healey for discussions and valuable criticism at the PSA meeting. I also owe much to discussions with Daniela Bailer-Jones.

References

Armstrong, David (1989), Universals. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Auyang, Sunny (1995), How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1980), Essays on Actions & Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 163180.Google Scholar
Dieks, Dennis (1990), “Quantum Statistics, Identical Particles, and Correlations”, Synthese 82: 127155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Steven and Redhead, Michael (1988), “Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 233246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haag, Rudolf (1996), Local Quantum Physics, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegerfeldt, Gerhard (1985), “Violation of Causality in Relativistic Quantum Theory?”, Physical Review Letters 54: 23952398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licht, A. L. (1966), “Local States”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 7: 16561669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, David (1996), “In Defense of Dogma: Why there cannot be a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of (Localizable) Particles”, in Clifton, Rob (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 110.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1960), Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. (1969), Ontological Relativity and other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. (1981), Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Redhead, Michael (1995), “More Ado about Nothing”, Foundations of Physics 25: 123137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter (1990), Individuals. An Essay on Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul (1995), An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul. (1996), “Wave and Particle Concepts in Quantum Field Theory”, in Clifton, Rob (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas (1991), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar