Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:29:43.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Character of Philosophic Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Rudolf Carnap*
Affiliation:
Philosophy is The Logic of Science

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Translated by W. M. Malisoff. Attention is called to the following choices taken by the translator:—Auffassung has been rendered variously as interpretation, conception, position; Folgerung as deduction, conclusion, inference, but in conformance with the discussion, most often as entailment. Gehalt which may mean value, has been rendered only as content; Inhalt as meaning; but inhaltlich as connotative, rather than strict or meaningful or intensional, which may convey as much.

References

Literature

(1) Philosophie als Wissenschaftslogik; Ausschaltung der Metaphysik:Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus logico-philosophicus. With an introduction by Russell, B. Kegan Paul, London, 1922.Google Scholar
Carnap, R., Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis 2, p. 219, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Philosophie als logische Syntax der Wissenschaftssprache:Google Scholar
Carnap, R., Logische Syntax der Sprache. (Schriften zur wiss. Weltauffassung, herausgeg. von Schlick und Frank, Band ….), Springer, Wien, 1933.Google Scholar