Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:19:23.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Issues Surrounding the Reduction of Macroeconomics to Microeconomics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Alan Nelson
Alan Nelson*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between modern theories of microeconomics and macroeconomics and, more generally, it evaluates the prospects of theoretically reducing macroeconomics to microeconomics. Many economists have shown strong interest in providing “microfoundations” for macroeconomics and much of their work is germane to the issue of theoretical reduction. Especially relevant is the work that has been done on what is called The Problem of Aggregation. On some accounts, The Problem of Aggregation just is the problem of reducing macroeconomics to microeconomics. I show how to separate these problems and then try to determine to what extent particular kinds of solutions to The Problem of Aggregation succeed in reducing macroeconomics to microeconomics as well. I argue that reduction is not possible by this means given the current state of microeconomics. I also describe how reduction may be possible by means of (dis)aggregation if microeconomics is supplemented in a certain way with the results of experimental research on individual economic agents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 573 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I must thank Gilbert Bassett, Arthur Fine, Daniel Hausman, Alexander Rosenberg, Julius Sensat, referees for Philosophy of Science, and especially Paul Teller for helpful suggestions. Although many of these suggestions have found their way into this paper, I alone am responsible for any remaining errors or misconceptions.

References

Battalio, R.; Kagel, J.; Rachlin, H.; and Green, L. (1981), “Commodity Choice Behavior with Pigeons as Subjects”, The Journal of Political Economy 89: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beare, J. (1978), Macroeconomics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1976), The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, L. (1982), The Foundations of Economic Method. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Coats, A. (1976), “Economics and Psychology: The Death and Resurrection of a Research Programme”, in Method and Appraisal in Economics, Latsis, S. (ed.), pp. 43–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. (1980), Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. (1974), “Special Sciences: (or The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)”, Synthese 28: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D., and Hynes, A. (1970), “On the Theory of Price Dynamics”, in Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation, Phelps, E. (ed.), pp. 369–93. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Green, H. A. J. (1964), Aggregation in Economic Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. (1946a), “Macroeconomics and the Theory of Rational Behavior”, Econometrica 14: 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. (1946b), “Remarks on the Theory of Aggregation”, Econometrica 14: 303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. (1982), The Applied Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Michalos, A. (1978), “Philosophy of Social Science”, in Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Asquith, P. and Kyburg, H. (eds.), pp. 463–502. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (forthcoming), “New Individualistic Foundations for Economics”, Noûs.Google Scholar
Okun, A. (1980), “Rational-expectations-with-misperceptions as a Theory of the Business Cycle”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 12: 817–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, E. (ed.) (1970), Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1973), “Reductionism and the Nature of Psychology”, Cognition 2: 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1976), Microeconomic Laws: A Philosophical Analysis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1980), “A Skeptical History of Microeconomic Theory”, Theory and Decision 12: 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. (1967), “Approaches to Reduction”, Philosophy of Science 34: 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. (1954), Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. (1979), Microfoundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1978), “Reduction and Reductionism”, in Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Asquith, P. and Kyburg, H. (eds.), pp. 352–77. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar