Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:31:28.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Introduction to Simplicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Richard Rudner
Richard Rudner*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Panel Discussion of Simplicity of Scientific Theories
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 109 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ackermann, Robert. Simplicity and the Acceptability of Scientific Theories, Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, 1960.Google Scholar
[2] Barker, S. F., Induction and Hypothesis, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[3] Goodman, Nelson, “Axiomatic Measurement of Simplicity,” The Journal of Philosophy, LII (1955), pp. 709–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Goodman, Nelson, “An Improvement in the Theory of Simplicity.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, XIV (1949), pp. 228–229.Google Scholar
[5] Goodman, Nelson, “The Logical Simplicity of Predicates.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, XIV (1949), pp. 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Goodman, Nelson, “New Notes on Simplicity,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, XVII (1952), pp. 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Goodman, Nelson, “On the Length of Primitive Ideas,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, VIII (1943), p. 39.Google Scholar
[8] Goodman, Nelson, “On the Simplicity of Ideas,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, VIII (1943), pp. 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Goodman, Nelson, “Recent Developments in the Theory of Simplicity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XIX (1959), pp. 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Goodman, Nelson, “Sequences.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, VI (1941), pp. 150–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Goodman, Nelson, The Structure of Appearance, Cambridge, 1951.Google Scholar
[12] Goodman, Nelson, “The Test of Simplicity,” Science, CXXVIII (1958), pp. 1064–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[13] Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, 1955.Google Scholar
[14] Jeffreys, Harold and Wrinch, Dorothy, “On Certain Fundamental Principles of Scientific Inquiry,” Philosophical Magazine, XLII (1921), pp. 369–390.Google Scholar
[15] Jeffreys, Harold, Scientific Inference, Cambridge, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Jeffreys, Harold, Theory of Probability, Oxford, 1948.Google Scholar
[17] Kemeny, John G., “A Logical Measure Function,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, XVIII (1953), pp. 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Kemeny, John G. “A New Approach to Semantics—Part I.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, XXI (1956), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Kemeny, John G. A Philosopher Looks at Science, Princeton, 1959.Google Scholar
[20] Kemeny, John G. “Two Measures of Simplicity,” The Journal of Philosophy, LII (1955), pp. 722–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Kemeny, John G., “The Use of Simplicity in Induction,” Philosophical Review, LVII (1953), pp. 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Rudner, Richard S., “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosphy of Science, XX (1953), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
[24] Rudner, Richard S., “Value Judgments in the Acceptance of Theories.” Philipp Frank, ed. The Validation of Scientific Theories, Boston, 1956.Google Scholar
[25] Suppes, Patrick, “Nelson Goodman on the Concept of Logical Simplicity.” Philosophy of Science, XXIII (1956), pp. 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Svenonius, Lars, “Definability and Simplicity.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, XX (1955), pp. 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar