Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:20:55.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applying the Causal Theory of Reference to Intentional Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

John Michael  and
Miles MacLeod
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that many recent philosophical discussions about the reference of everyday concepts of intentional states have implicitly been predicated on descriptive theories of reference. To rectify this, we attempt to demonstrate how a causal theory can be applied to intentional concepts. Specifically, we argue that some phenomena in early social development (e.g., mimicry, gaze following, and emotional contagion) can serve as reference fixers that enable children to track others’ intentional states and, thus, to refer to those states. This allows intentional concepts to be anchored to their referents, even if folk psychological descriptions turn out to be false.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 212 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We would like to thank Ruth Millikan, Brian Epstein, Dan Dennett, Edouard Machery, Joe McCaffrey, two anonymous reviewers, and also audiences at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of Vienna for very helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this article. Miles MacLeod’s participation was supported by the Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, Austria, and the US National Science Foundation (DRL097394084).

References

Anisfeld, M. 1991. “Neonatal Imitation.” Developmental Review 11:60–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, I. A., and Butterfill, A. B. 2009. “Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?” Psychological Review 116:953–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., and He, Z. 2010. “False-Belief Understanding in Infants.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (3): 110–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D., and Moses, L. 1994. “Early Understanding of Referential Intent and Attentional Focus: Evidence from Language and Emotion.” In Origins of an Understanding of Mind, ed. Lewis, C. and Mitchell, P., 365–73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Begliomini, C., Sartori, L., Feltrin, G., and Castiello, U. 2012. “Social Grasping: From Mirroring to Mentalizing.” NeuroImage 61 (1): 240–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bermudez, J. 2003. “The Domain of Folk Psychology.” In Minds and Persons, ed. O’Hear, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bischof-Köhler, D. 1991. “The Development of Empathy in Infants.” In Infant Development: Perspectives from German Speaking Countries, ed. Lamb, M. E. and Keller, H., 245–73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., and von Cramon, D. Y. 2005. “The Inhibition of Imitative and Overlearned Responses: A Functional Double Dissociation.” Neuropsychologia 43:89–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bushnell, I. W. R. 2001. “Mother’s Face Recognition in Newborn Infants: Learning and Memory.” Infant and Child Development 10 (March): 67–74. doi:10.1002/icd.248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, Tanya, and Bargh, John A. 1999. “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (6): 893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, C. M., and Chartrand, T. L. 2003. “Self-Monitoring without Awareness: Using Mimicry as a Nonconscious Affiliation Strategy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:1170–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churchland, P. M. 1981. “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.” Journal of Philosophy 78:67–90.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. 1991. “Methodological Reflections on Belief.” In Mind and Common Sense, ed. Bogdan, R., 53–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Vignemont, F., and Singer, T. 2006. “The Empathic Brain: How, When and Why?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (19): 535–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, M. 1981. Designation. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimberg, Ulf. 1997. “Facial Reactions: Rapidly Evoked Emotional Responses.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11 (2): 115–23.Google Scholar
Doherty, M. J. 2009. Theory of Mind: How Children Understand Others’ Thoughts and Feelings. Hove: Psychology.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., and Fabes, R. A. 1998. “Prosocial Development.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, 5th ed., ed. Eisenberg, N., 701–78. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Enç, B. 1976. “Reference of Theoretical Terms.” Nous 10:261–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farroni, T., Csibra, G., Simion, F., and Johnson, M. 2002. “Eye Contact Detection at Birth.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:9602–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1962. “Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism.” In Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, ed. Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G., 28–97. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1990. A Theory of Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik C: 25–50.Google Scholar
Geangu, A., Bengu, O., Stahl, D., and Striano, T. 2010. “Contagious Crying beyond the First Days of Life.” Infant Behavioural Development 33 (3): 279–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., and Király, I. 2002. “Rational Imitation in Preverbal Infants.” Nature 415:755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossman, T., Parise, E., and Frederici, A. 2010. “The Detection of Communicative Signals Directed at the Self in Infant Prefrontal Cortex.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., and Rapson, R. L. 1994. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hess, U. 1998. “Mimicry: Fact and Fiction.” In Proceedings of the Xth Conference of the International Society for Research on Emotion. Storrs, CT: International Society for Research on Emotions.Google Scholar
Hess, Ursula, and Bourgeois, Patrick. 2010. “You Smile—I Smile: Emotion Expression in Social Interaction.” Biological Psychology 84 (3): 514–20. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. 2001. “Causes and Consequences of Imitation.” Trends in Cognitive Science 5 (6): 253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, B., Willen, J., and Driver, J. 1998. “Adults’ Eyes Trigger Shifts of Visual Attention in Human Infants.” Psychological Science 9 (2): 131–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutto, D. 2012. “Elementary Mind Minding, Enactivist Style.” In Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind and Social Neuroscience, ed. Seemans, A., 307–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark H., Dziurawiec, Suzanne, Ellis, Hadyn, and Morton, John. 1991. “Newborns’ Preferential Tracking of Face-Like Stimuli and Its Subsequent Decline.” Cognition 40 (August): 1–19. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90045-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1972. “Naming and Necessity.” In Semantics of Natural Language, ed. Davidson, D. and Harman, G., 253–355. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, F. W. 1985. “Theoretical Terms and the Causal View of Reference.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 (2): 143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, F. W. 2011. “Theory-Dependence, Warranted Reference, and the Epistemic Dimensions of Realism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2): 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kugiumutzakis, G. 1999. “Genesis and Development of Early Infant Mimesis to Facial and Vocal Models.” In Imitation in Infancy: Cambridge Studies in Cognitive Perceptual Development, ed. Nadel, Jacqueline and Butterworth, George, 36–59. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lang, P., Greenwald, M., Bradley, M., and Hamm, A. 1993. “Looking at Pictures: Affective, Facial, Visceral, and Behavioral Reactions.” Psychophysiology 30 (3): 261–73. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanzetta, J. T., and Englis, B. G. 1989. “Expectations of Cooperation and Competition and Their Effects on Observers’ Vicarious Emotional Responses.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (4): 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, E., and Margolis, S. 2002. “Radical Concept Nativism.” Cognition 86:25–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lycan, W. 1988. Judgement and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mallon, R., Machery, E., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. 2009. “Against Arguments from Reference.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2): 332–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. 1995. “Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children.” Developmental Psychology 31:838–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzoff, A. N., and Moore, K. 1977. “Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates.” Science 198:75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. 1998. “A Common Structure for Concepts of Individuals, Stuffs and Real Kinds: More Mama, More Milk and More Mouse.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:55–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millikan, R. 2000. On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, H., and Tomasello, M. 2004. “12- and 18-Month-Old Infants Follow Gaze to Spaces Behind Barriers.” Developmental Science 7:F1–F9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondloch, Catherine J., Lewis, Terri L., Budreau, D. Robert, Maurer, Daphne, Dannemiller, James L., Stephens, Benjamin R., and Kleiner-Gathercoal, Kathleen A. 1999. “Face Perception during Early Infancy.” Psychological Science 10 (5): 419–22. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nola, R. 1980. “Fixing the Reference of Theoretical Terms.” Philosophy of Science 47 (4): 505–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onishi, K. H., and Baillargeon, R. 2005. “Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?” Science 308 (8): 255–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacherie, E. 2005. “Perceiving Intentions.” In A Explicação da Interpretação Humana, ed. Sàágua, João, 401–14. Lisbon: Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
Perner, J., and Ruffman, T. 2005. “Infants’ Insight into the Mind: How Deep?” Science 308:212–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, J. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. 2005. “The Return of Concept Empiricism.” In Categorization and Cognitive Science, ed. Cohen, H. and Leferbvre, C. Cambridge: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, ed. Putnam, H., 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1905. “On Denoting.” Mind 14:479–93.Google Scholar
Sagi, A., and Hoffman, M. L. 1976. “Empathic Distress in Newborns.” Developmental Psychology 12:175–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, M., and Jong, H. De. 1998. “Defusing Eliminative Materialism: Reference and Revision.” Philosophical Psychology 11 (4): 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senju, A., and Csibra, G. 2008. “Gaze-Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals.” Developmental Science 18 (9): 678–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Song, H., Onishi, K., Baillargeon, R., and Fisher, C. 2008. “Can an Agent’s False Belief Be Corrected through an Appropriate Communication? Psychological Reasoning in 18-Month-Old Infants.” Cognition 109:295–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southgate, V., Senju, A., and Csibra, G. 2007. “Action Anticipation through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds.” Psychological Science 18:587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanford, P. K., and Kitcher, P. 2000. “Refining the Causal Theory of Reference for Natural Kind Terms.” Philosophical Studies 97 (1): 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stel, M., van Dijk, E., and Olivier, E. 2009. “You Want to Know the Truth? Then Don’t Mimic!” Psychological Science 20 (6): 693–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. 1985. The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Stich, S. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll, H. 2005. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Träuble, B., Marinović, V., and Pauen, S. 2010. “Early Theory of Mind Competencies: Do Infants Understand Others’ Beliefs?” Infancy 15 (4): 434–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, Gail E., Bower, N. J. A., and Bower, T. G. R. 1992. “Recognition of Familiar Faces by Newborns.” Infant Behavior and Development 15 (2): 265–69. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(92)80027-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B. Y., and Hamilton, A. 2012. “Social Top-Down Social Response Modulation (STORM): A Model of the Control of Mimicry in Social Interaction.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F., and Carey, S. 1996. “Infant Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity.” Cognitive Psychology 30:111–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., and Chapman, M. 1992. “Development of Concern for Others.” Developmental Psychology 28 (1): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar