Article contents
Causality and Determinism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2022
Abstract
A previous paper of mine, that criticized Suppes' probabilistic theory of causality, was in turn criticized by Deborah Rosen. This paper is a development of my argument and an answer to Rosen. It is argued that the concept of causation is used in contemporary science in a way that presupposes determinism. It is shown that deterministic assumptions are necessary for inferences from generic to individual causal relations and for various kinds of eliminative arguments.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1975), “Causality and Determination.” In E. Sosa (ed.) Causation and Conditionals. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960), Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Feinstein, A. (1971), “How do we measure ‘safety and efficacy'?” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 12: 544–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesslow, G. (1976), “Two Notes on the Probabilistic Approach to Causality.” Philosophy of Science 43: 290–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1974), “The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes.” American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411.Google ScholarPubMed
Pap, A. (1962), An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. S. (1966), Social Research: Strategy and Tactics. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. L. and Angeli, M. (1977), Basic Pathology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. (1975), “An Argument for the Logical Notion of a Memory Trace. “ Philosophy of Science 42: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, D. (1978), “In Defence of a Probabilistic Theory of Causality.” Philosophy of Science 45: 604–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. S. (1971), Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10
- Cited by