Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:26:13.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chance and the Patterns of Drift: A Natural Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Robert C. Richardson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolutionary models can explain the dynamics of populations, how genetic, genotypic, or phenotypic frequencies change with time. Models incorporating chance, or drift, predict specific patterns of change. These are illustrated using classic work on blood types by Cavalli-Sforza and his collaborators in the Parma Valley of Italy, in which the theoretically predicted patterns are exhibited in human populations. These data and the models display properties of ensembles of populations. The explanatory problem needs to be understood in terms of how likely an observed change, in either a population or an ensemble, would be under drift alone; this is fundamentally a matter of chance. Understood in this way, issues of drift and chance undercut most recent philosophical, but not biological, discussions of the role of “genetic drift.”

Type
Case Studies on Chance in Evolution
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Miriam Solomon , December 2006 , pp. 642 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I have been fortunate enough to discuss these issues, over many years, with a number of colleagues, including John Beatty, Robert Brandon, Richard Burian, Paul Davies, Roberta Millstein, Thomas Polger, and Robert Skipper. Thomas Kane in particular led me to look at the work by Cavalli-Sforza and did a great deal in shaping my thinking. Finally, I am grateful for the support of the Taft Faculty Committee at various stages of my work.

References

Barrai, I., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Moroni, A. (1962), “Frequencies of Pedigrees of Consanguineous Marriages and Mating Structure of the Populations,” Annals of Human Genetics 25:347–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J. (1984), “Chance and Natural Selection,” Philosophy of Science 51:183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J. (1990), “Dobzhansky and Drift,” in L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, and M. S. Morgan (eds.), The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 271–311.Google Scholar
Beatty, J. (2006). “Chance and History: Darwin on Orchids (and Especially Twisted Orchids),” Philosophy of Science 73(5), in this issue.Google Scholar
Brandon, R., and Carson, S. (1996), “The Indeterministic Character of Evolutionary Theory: No ‘No Hidden Variables Proof’ but No Room for Determinism Either,” Philosophy of Science 63:315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1966), “Population Structure and Human Evolution,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 164:362–379.Google ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1969), “Genetic Drift in an Italian Population,” Scientific American 223:26–33.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2000), Genes, Peoples and Languages. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Moroni, A., and Zei, G. (2004). Consanguinity, Inbreeding, and Genetic Drift in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Zei, G. (1967), “Experiments with an Artificial Population,” in Crow, James F. and Neel, James V. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress of Human Genetics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, M. R. (2006). “Nothing Left to Chance?: The Place of Random Drift in the Neutralist/Selectionist Controversy,” Philosophy of Science 73(5), in this issue.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1937), Genetics and the Origin of Species. 1st ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1989), Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 3rd ed. Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Glymour, B. (2001), “Selection, Indeterminism, and Evolutionary Theory,” Philosophy of Science 68:518–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, L., Horan, B. L., and Rosenberg, A. (1999), “Is Indeterminism the Source of the Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory?” Philosophy of Science 66:140–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. (1990), “Natural Selection as a Causal, Empirical, and Probabilistic Theory,” in L. Krüger, G. Gigerenzer, and M. S. Morgan (eds.), The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 233–270.Google Scholar
Horan, B. L. (1994), “The Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory,” Philosophy of Science 61:76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, W., and Wright, S. (1954), “Experimental Studies of the Distribution of Gene Frequencies in Very Small Populations of Drosophila melanogaster: I. Forked,” Evolution 8:172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. (1964), “Diffusion Models in Population Genetics,” Journal of Applied Probability 1:177–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1976), “Natural Selection and Random Genetic Drift in Phenotypic Evolution,” Evolution 30:314–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millstein, R. (2002), “Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?” Biology and Philosophy 17:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R. C. (2001), “Complexity, Self Organization and Selection,” Biology and Philosophy 16:655–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R. C., and Burian, R. M. (1992), “A Defense of Propensity Interpretations of Fitness,” in Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Okruhlik, K. (eds.), PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 349–362.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1988), “Is the Theory of Natural Selection a Statistical Theory?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14:187–207.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1994), Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J. (1979), Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skipper, R. A. Jr. (2006), “Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics: Drift versus Draft,” Philosophy of Science 73(5), in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1931). “Evolution in Mendelian Populations,” Genetics 16:97–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1932), “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding, and Selection,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics 1:356–366.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1945), “The Differential Equations of the Distribution of Gene Frequencies,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 31:382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar