Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:32:33.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contingency and History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Kim Sterelny
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Debates on the contingency of history have largely focused on the history of life. This article targets the supposed contingency of human history. It does not defend a global claim about the overall contingency of history. Rather, it aims to identify and explain the difference between robust and fragile historical trajectories. It does so by considering a set of contrasting cases and identifying critical differences among the cases. The analysis shows that one important source of contingency is the historical emergence of command-and-control institutions; one important source of robustness is the existence of population-level processes structured by relatively stable institutions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 521 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Joe Bulbulia, Adrian Currie, John Matthewson, Ron Planer, and the referees of this journal for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. Thanks also to audiences at University of Sydney and Victoria University at Wellington for constructive feedback and to the Australian Research Council for their generous funding of my research into human evolutionary history.

References

Beatty, John. 2006. “Replaying Life’s Tape.” Journal of Philosophy 103 (7): 336–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1960. An Economic Analysis of Fertility: Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Menahen, Yemima. 1997. “Historical Contingency.” Ratio 10:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Menahen, Yemima 2009. “Historical Necessity and Contingency.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography, ed Aviever Tucker, 120–30. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis. 2002. In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. Los Angles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bunzl, Martin. 2004. “Counterfactual History: A User’s Guide.” American Historical Review 109:845–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcott, Brett. 2014. “Evolvability and Engineering.” Biology and Philosophy 29:293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59:341–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1961. What Is History? New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Clark, Chris. 2013. The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Coddington, Edward. 1984. The Gettysburg Campaign. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
de Wolf, Jan. 1990. “Ecology and Conquest: Critical Notes on Kelly’s Model of Nuer Expansion.” Ethnology 29:341–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Fritz. 1968. Germany’s Aims in the First World War. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent, and Marcus, Joyce. 2012. The Creation of Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Leonore, and Brandon, Robert. 2015. “Why Flying Dogs Are Rare: A General Theory of Luck in Evolutionary Transitions.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 49:24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hastings, Max. 2015. Catastrophe 1914: Europe Goes to War. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Haufe, Chris. 2015. “Gould’s Laws.” Philosophy of Science 82 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1991. Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkpen, Robert, and Turner, Derek. 2012. “The Topography of Historical Contingency.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 6:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. 1992. “In Defence of Explanatory Ecumenicalism.” Economics and Philosophy 8:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, John. 1998. The First World War. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert C. 1985. The Nuer Conquest: The Structure and Development of an Expansionist System. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. “Learning from Contingency: The Case of World War I.” International Journal 63 (2): 447–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned 2014. Archduke Franz Ferdinand Lives! A World without World War I. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Levins, Richard. 1966. “The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology.” American Scientist 54:421–31.Google Scholar
Menary, Richard, ed. 2010. The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Ian. 2015. Foragers, Farmers and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Monica B. 1998. “The Demographic Transition: Are We Any Closer to an Evolutionary Explanation?” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:266–70.Google Scholar
Nolan, Daniel. 2013. “Why Historians (and Everyone Else) Should Care about Counterfactuals.” Philosophical Studies 163:317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, Ara, Shariff, Azim, Slingerland, Edward, Gervais, Will, McNamara, Rita, and Henrich, Joseph. 2016. “The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions.” Behavioral and Brain Science 39, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Don. 2005. Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Don 2006. “The Economic and Evolutionary Basis of Selves.” Cognitive Systems Research 7:246–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, Debora, and Ferejohn, John. 1984. “Rational Choice and Social Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 102:71–87.Google Scholar
Spolaore, Enrico, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2014. “Fertility and Modernity.” Technical Report, Department of Economics, Tufts University.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim. 1996. “Explanatory Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology.” Biology and Philosophy 11:193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim 2012. “From Fitness to Utility.” In Evolution, Co-operation and Rationality, ed Ken Binmore and Samir Okasha, 246–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, Kim 2015. “Content, Control and Display: The Natural Origins of Content.” Philosophia 43 (3): 549–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim, and Griffiths, Paul. 1999. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Parker, Geoffrey, eds. 2009. Unmaking the West: “What-If” Scenarios That Rewrite World History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Turchin, Peter. 2006. War and Peace and War. New York: Pi.Google Scholar
Zawidzki, Tad. 2013. Mindshaping. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar