Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:42:25.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Carnap's Ontology and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

John Sweigart
John Sweigart*
Affiliation:
Jacksonville University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1963 , pp. 71 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Carnap, Rudolph, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 11 (1950), pp. 20–40. Reprinted in Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, ed. Linsky, L., Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, 1952, pp. 208–228. Also reprinted in [4], pp. 205–221.Google Scholar
[2] Carnap, Rudolph, “Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages,” Philosophical Studies, 6 (1955), pp. 33–47. Reprinted in [4], pp. 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Carnap, Rudolph, “On Some Concepts of Pragmatics,” Philosophical Studies, 6 (1955), pp. 88–91. Reprinted in [4], pp. 248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Carnap, Rudolph, Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
[5] Chisholm, Roderick M., “A Note on Carnap's Meaning Analysis,” Philosophical Studies, 6 (1955), pp. 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Chisholm, Roderick M., Perceiving: A Philosophical Study, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
[7] Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
[8] Goodman, Nelson, “On Likeness of Meaning,” Analysis, 10 (1949), pp. 1–7. Reprinted in Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, pp. 67–74. Also reprinted, with foreward, in Philosophy and Analysis, ed. MacDonald, M., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1954, pp. 54–62.Google Scholar
[9] Goodman, Nelson, “On some Differences About Meaning,” Analysis, 13 (1953), pp. 90–96. Reprinted in Philosophy and Analysis, pp. 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Goodman, Nelson, The Structure of Appearance, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
[11] Martin, Richard M., “On the Notion of Analytic Truth,” Papers of the Inter-American Congress of Philosophy, Washington, 1957.Google Scholar
[12] Martin, Richard M., The Notion of Analytic Truth, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Quine, W. V., From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
[14] Quine, W. V., “On Carnap's Views on Ontology,” Philosophical Studies, 2 (1951), pp. 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Sweigart, John W. Jr. “On Sameness of Meaning,” Philosophical Studies, 9 (1958), pp. 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Tarski, Alfred, “On the Concept of Logical Consequence,” Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, trans. Woodger, J. H., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956, pp. 409–420.Google Scholar