We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Cupples, B. (1977), “Three Types of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science44: 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, R., Kaplan, D., and Montague, R. (1961), “Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation.” Philosophy of Science28: 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C., and Oppenheim, P. (1965), “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Reprinted in C. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 245–295. Originally published 1945.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1961), “Explanation Revisited.” Philosophy of Science28: 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moor, J. (1976), “The Cancellation of Symmetrical Contraries and The Principle of Significant Contradictories.” Philosophy of Science43: 550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1974), Confirmation and Confirmability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1978), “On a Matter of Principle.” Philosophy of Science45: 312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar