Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:20:55.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Projecting Unprojectibles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Robert J. Ackermann
Robert J. Ackermann*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 1966 , pp. 70 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. (1st ed.) Cambridge, 1955.Google Scholar
[2] Goodman, Nelson, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. (2nd ed.) Indianapolis, 1965.Google Scholar
[3] Kahane, Howard, “Nelson Goodman's Entrenchment Theory.” Philosophy of Science 32, 1965, pp. 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Leblanc, Hugues, “That Positive Instances Are No Help.” The Journal of Philosophy 60, 1963, pp. 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar