Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:33:16.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Ultimate and Proximate Consequences in Causal Decision Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Brian Skyrms*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California at Irvine

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gibbard, A., and Harper, W. (1981), “Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility”, in Ifs, Harper, W. et al. (eds.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 153–90. (First published in Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, vol. 1, C. Hooker et al. [eds.]. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1978, pp. 125–62.)Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. (1965), The Logic of Decision. New York: McGraw-Hill. (2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.)Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1982), “A Note on Newcombmania”, The Journal of Philosophy 79: 337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. (1983), “The Wrong Box”, The Journal of Philosophy 80: 534–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1983), “Levi against U-maximization”, The Journal of Philosophy 80: 531–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954), The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1984), Pragmatics and Empiricism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. H. (forthcoming), “Circumstances and Dominance in a Causal Decision Theory”, Synthese.Google Scholar