Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:30:39.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversity in the Behavioral Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

William Sacksteder
William Sacksteder*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is fairly usual to argue or to assume that there is a single pattern of proper scientific endeavor for the behavioral sciences. This is based, one is inclined to say, on the superb model afforded by the natural science successes of the past few hundred years and on the common method which underlies and determines that model. Consequently, a protagonist can argue that within his own science, all opposed modes of thinking are archaic, peripheral, or unscientific, while his own at least prefigures fulfillment of true science. And it may even be claimed that other behavioral fields are special offshoots, subordinate provinces, or particularizations which are reducible to his favored scheme of analysis. Such diversity and disagreement as there is, it can be said, stems from either of two causes. The first is the stubbornness of men, whereby they refuse to face the facts, to employ reasoning processes properly, or to foresake sinister interests. The other is the relative immaturity of behavioral science, an immaturity which will be eliminated by patient progress.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 1963 , pp. 375 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Jevons, W. Stanley, The Theory of Political Economy, (London, Macmillan and Co., 1888)Google Scholar
[2] Keynes, J. M., The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, (New York, Harcourt, Brace, and Co., 1935)Google Scholar
[3] Pigou, A. C., The Economics of Welfare, (London, Macmillan, 1920)Google Scholar
[4] Sombart, Werner, “Capitalism,” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, (New York, Macmillan and Co., 1937), Volume III.Google Scholar
[5] Sombart, Werner, The Quintessence of Capitalism, (London, T. Fisher Unwin, 1915).Google Scholar
[6] Veblen, Thorstein, The Place of Science in Modern Civilization, and other Essays, (New York, B. W. Huebsch, 1919).Google Scholar
[7] Veblen, Thorstein, Theory of Business Enterprise, (New York, New American Library, 1958).Google Scholar