Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:01:56.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergents from Fusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Hong Yu Wong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a critical discussion of Paul Humphreys's fusion view of emergence, focusing on the basal loss feature of his ontology. The discussion yields some general morals for special science ontology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 345 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I am grateful to the editor, Paul Humphreys, Timothy O'Connor, Krisztina Orbán, Paul Snowdon, and Georg Theiner for discussion and comments, and to Michael Martin for valuable advice on restructuring.

References

Armstrong, D. M. (1978), Universals and Scientific Realism. vols. 1–2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1925), The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim (1999), “The Significance of Emergence,” in Gillett, Carl and Loewer, Barry (eds.), Physicalism and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207–224.Google Scholar
Guitton, Daniel, Bergeron, André, Choi, W. Y., and Matsuo, Satoshi (2003), “On the Feedback Control of Orienting Gaze Shifts Made with Eye and Head Movements,” Progress in Brain Research 142:55–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, Paul (1996), “Aspects of Emergence,” Philosophical Topics 24 (1): 53–70..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1997a), “How Properties Emerge,” Philosophy of Science 64:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (1997b), “Emergence, Not Supervenience,” Philosophy of Science 64:S337–S345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Paul (2000), “Extending Ourselves,” in Carrier, Martin, Massey, Gerald J., and Ruetsche, Laura (eds.), Science at Century’s End. Pittsburg/Konstanz: University of Pittsburg Press/Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1973), “Causation, Nomic Subsumption, and the Concept of Event,” Journal of Philosophy 70:217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1992), “‘Downward Causation’ in Emergentism and Nonreductive Physicalism,” in Beckermann, Angsar, Flohr, Hans, and Kim, Jaegwon (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Berlin: de Gruyter, 119–138.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, Jaegwon (1993), Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1999), “Making Sense of Emergence,” Philosophical Studies 95:3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (2006), “Being Realistic about Emergence,” in Clayton, Philip and Davies, Paul (eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–202.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (1997), “On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back,” Synthese 112:193–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian (1992), “The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism,” in Beckermann, Angsar, Flohr, Hans, and Kim, Jaegwon (eds.), Emergence or Reduction? Berlin: de Gruyter, 49–93.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian (1995), “Varieties of Supervenience,” in Savellos, Elias E. and Yalçin, Ümit D. (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 16–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Brian (1997), “Emergence and Supervenience,” Intellectica 25:25–43.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1843), System of Logic. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, & Dyer.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy (1994), ‘‘Emergent Properties,” American Philosophical Quarterly 31:91–104.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy, and Wong, Hong Yu (2002), “Emergent Properties,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties-emergent/.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy, and Wong, Hong Yu (2005), “The Metaphysics of Emergence,” Noûs 39:658–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David (1995), “Arguments for Supervenience and Physical Realization,” in Savellos, Elias E. and Yalçin, Ümit D., Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney (1980), “Causality and Properties,” in Inwagen, Peter van (ed.), Time and Cause. Dordrecht: Reidel, 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapp, Henry (1993), Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Evan, and Varela, Francisco J. (2001), “Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness,” Trends in Cognitive Science 5/10:418–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Peter (2006), All the Power in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1990), “Mind-Dust or Magic? Panpsychism versus Emergence,” Philosophical Perspectives 4:216–226.Google Scholar
Wigner, Eugene P. (1961), “Remarks on the Mind-Body Question,” in Good, I. J. (ed.), The Scientist Speculates. New York: Basic, 284–302.Google Scholar
Wong, Hong Yu (2007), “The Secret Lives of Emergents,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar