Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:35:13.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formal Models and Achinstein's “Analogies”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

T. R. Girill
T. R. Girill*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 96 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Achinstein, P., “Models, Analogies, and Theories,” Philosophy of Science, vol. XXXI, no. 4, October, 1964, pp. 328–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Achinstein, P., “Approaches to the Philosophy of Science,” The Legacy of Logical Positivism (eds. Achinstein, Peter and Barker, Stephen), The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1969, pp. 259–291.Google Scholar
[3] Braithwaite, R., Scientific Explanation, Harper Torchbook, 1953.Google Scholar
[4] Carnap, R., “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” in Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press, 1956, pp. 205–231.Google Scholar
[5] Nagel, E., The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.10.1119/1.1937571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Pap, A., Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
[7] Suppes, P., Introduction to Logic, Van Nostrand, 1957.Google Scholar