Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:18:47.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional Properties and Convergence in Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Mark B. Couch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolutionary convergence is often appealed to in support of claims about multiple realization. The idea is that convergence shows that the same function can be realized by different kinds of structures. I argue here that the nature of convergence is more complicated than it might appear at first look. Broad claims about convergence are made by biologists during general discussions of the mechanisms of evolution. In their specialized work, though, biologists are often more limited in the claims they make. I will examine a standard example to show how claims about convergence can be oversimplified.

Type
Topics in Evolutionary Theory
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 1041 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

For help with this paper, I would like to thank Colin Allen, Bernard Berofsky, John Bickle, Carl Gillett, Brian Keeley, and Philip Kitcher.

References

Ali, M. A., ed. (1984), Photoreception and Vision in Invertebrates. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned (1997), “Anti-reductionism Slaps Back”, Anti-reductionism Slaps Back 11:107–132.Google Scholar
Block, Ned, and Fodor, Jerry (1980), “What Psychological States Are Not”, in Block, Ned (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 237–250.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert G. (1998), “Visual Perception”, in Greenberg, Gary and Haraway, Maury M. (eds.), Comparative Psychology: A Handbook. New York: Garland Publishing, 332–336.Google Scholar
Fernald, Russell (1997), “The Evolution of Eyes”, The Evolution of Eyes 50:253–259.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillett, Carl (2003), “The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special Sciences”, The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special Sciences 100:591–603.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, Milton, and Goslow, G. E. Jr. (2001), Analysis of Vertebrate Structure, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kincaid, Harold (1990), “Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science”, Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science 57:575–593.Google Scholar
Mather, Jennifer A. (1995), “Cognition in Cephalopods”, in Slater, P. J. B., Rosenblatt, J. S., Snowdon, C. T., and Milinksi, M. (eds.), Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 24. San Diego: Academic Press, 317–353.Google Scholar
Messenger, J. B. (1981), “Comparative Physiology of Vision in Molluscs”, in Autrum, H. (ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, VII/6C. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 93–200.Google Scholar
Messenger, J. B. (1991), “Photoreception and Vision in Molluscs”, in Cronly-Dillon, J. and Gregory, R. (eds.), Evolution of the Eye and Visual System. New York: Macmillan, 364–397.Google Scholar
Packard, A. (1972), “Cephalopods and Fish: The Limits of Convergence”, Cephalopods and Fish: The Limits of Convergence 47:241–307.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1975), “The Nature of Mental States”, in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffman, H. R. (1990), Sensation and Perception, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lawrence A. (2000), “Multiple Realizations”, Multiple Realizations 97:635–654.Google Scholar
Suomi, Stephen J., and Immelmann, Klaus (1983), “On the Process and Product of Cross-Species Generalization”, in Rajecki, D. W. (ed.), Comparing Behavior: Studying Man Studying Animals. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 203–224.Google Scholar
Volpe, Peter E. (1985), Understanding Evolution, 5th ed. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Publishers.Google Scholar
Wolken, Jerome J. (1995), Light Detectors, Photoreceptors, and Imaging Systems in Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar