Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:27:01.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Quantum Mechanics Pointless?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Frank Arntzenius
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There exist well-known conundrums, such as measure-theoretic paradoxes and problems of contact, which, within the context of classical physics, can be used to argue against the existence of points in space and space-time. I examine whether quantum mechanics provides additional reasons for supposing that there are no points in space and space-time.

Type
Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 1447 - 1457
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Böhm, Arno (1978), The Rigged Hilbert Space and Quantum Mechanics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogolubov, Nikolai, Logunov, Andrzej, and Todorov, Igor (1975), Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Caratheodory, Camille (1963), Algebraic Theory of Measure and Integration. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Halvorson, Hans (2001a), “On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics”, On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics 30:27–50.Google Scholar
Halvorson, Hans (2001b), “Complementarity of Representations in Quantum Mechanics”, http://xxx.lanl.gov/archive/quant-ph, 0110102.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (1993), “Logical Atoms and Combinatorial Possibility”, Logical Atoms and Combinatorial Possibility 90 (5): 219–232..Google Scholar