Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:06:34.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leibniz's Principle of The Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Alberto Cortes
Alberto Cortes*
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In considering the possibility that the fundamental particles of matter might violate Leibniz's Principle, one is confronted with logical proofs that the Principle is a Theorem of Logic. This paper shows that the proof of that theorem is not universal enough to encompass entities that might not be unique, and also strongly suggests that photons, for example, do violate Leibniz's Principle. It also shows that the existence of non-individuals would imply the breakdown of Quine's criterion of ontological commitment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 1976 , pp. 491 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Drs. Charles Daniels, James Fetzer and Kenneth Ketner for very useful criticisms of earlier versions of this paper; also I would like to thank very particularly Dr. Wesley Salmon, who suggested a very fruitful change of strategy in the paper, and the anonymous referee whose criticisms of the semi-final version of this paper were extremely valuable for its clarification. I presented some of the basic ideas of this paper for the first time in a talk to the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Indiana University in the Fall of 1970. They were later incorporated into my dissertation, [2]. Also, some of these ideas were presented in a paper read at the annual meeting of the New Mexico-West Texas Philosophical Society at Alburquerque, New Mexico in April, 1975.

References

REFERENCES

Carnap, R. Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications. New York: Dover, 1958.Google Scholar
Cortes, A. Identity in Quantum Mechanics. Indiana: Unpublished dissertation, 1971.Google Scholar
Kalish, D. and Montague, R. Logic. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. The Nature of Physical Reality. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1950.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. “The Exclusion Principle and its Philosophical Importance.” Philosophy of Science 11 (1944): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper & Row, [1953] 1963.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
Russell, B. The Philosophy of Leibniz. London: George Allen, 1951.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. Individuals. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., [1959] 1963.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. Introduction to Logic. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand, [1957] 1964.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. The Philosophy of Science. New York: Harper & Row, [1953] 1960.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. C. “Probabilities and the Problem of Individuation.” In Probabilities, Problems and Paradoxes. Edited by Luckenbach, S. A. Encino, California: Dickenson Publishing Company, 1972.Google Scholar