Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:29:48.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marshall Edelson Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1984), x+179 pp. $20.00 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Michael Lavin*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Erwin, E. (1978), Behavioral Therapy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1979), Understanding Scientific Reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1984), The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Luborsky, L., and Mintz, J. (1974), “What Sets off Momentary Forgetting During a Psychoanalysis?”, Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science 3: 233–68.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1964), “Mr. Farrell and the Refutability of Psychoanalysis”, Inquiry 7: 8098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1959), “Methodological Issues in Psychoanalytic Theory”, in Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy, Hook, S. (ed.), New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1967), “What is a Scientific Theory”, in Philosophy of Science Today, Morgenbesser, S. (ed.), New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, R. (1984), “Review of Farrell's The Standing of Psychoanalysis”, The Standing of Psychoanalysis 18: 534–41.Google Scholar