Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:16:04.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More Telltale Signs: What Attention to Representation Reveals about Scientific Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Andrea I. Woody
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores the connection between representation and explanation in the sciences. I suggest that scientific representation schemes be viewed as pragmatic tools for acquiring the sort of articulated awareness that is the hallmark of nontrivial knowledge. Crystal field theory in chemistry illustrates this perspective. Certain representations achieve the status of being paradigmatically explanatory, thereby shaping models of intelligibility. In turn, these explanatory preferences serve largely to define and differentiate disciplinary communities by implicitly endorsing particular epistemic aims and values. In this way, the pragmatic nature of explanatory discourse effectively grants its intellectual utility.

Type
The Pragmatics of Scientific Representation
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 780 - 793
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Paul Teller, Steve Weininger, and Theodore Brown for constructive comments and discussion.

References

Friedman, Michael (1974), “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Explanation and Scientific Understanding 71:5–19.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John (1998), Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965), “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Huheey, James (1983), Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13: Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar