Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T08:50:16.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Evidence and New Explanation II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Carl G. Wagner
Carl G. Wagner*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The University of Tennessee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Additional results are reported on the author's earlier generalization of Richard Jeffrey's solution to the problem of old evidence and new explanation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 283 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Mathematics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1300.

‡

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (SBR-9528893).

References

Glymour, C. (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1983), The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1988), “Conditioning, Kinematics, and Exchangeability”, in Skyrms, B. and Harper, W. (eds.), Causation, Chance, and Credence, vol. 1. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1991), “Postscript 1991: New Explanation Revisited”, in Jeffrey 1992, 103–107.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1992), Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1995), “Probability Reparation: the Problem of New Explanation”, Philosophical Studies 77:97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, C. (1997), “Old Evidence and New Explanation”, Philosophy of Science 64:677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar