We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
[1]
[1]Ackermann, R. “Deductive Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science32 (1965): 155–167.10.1086/288036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]
[2]Ackermann, R., and Stenner, A. “A Corrected Model of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science33 (1966): 168–171.10.1086/288087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]
[3]Eberle, R., Kaplan, D., and Montague, R. “Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation.” Philosophy of Science28 (1961): 418–428.10.1086/287828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]
[4]Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science15 (1948): 135–175.10.1086/286983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]
[5]Kaplan, D. “Explanation Revisited.” Philosophy of Science28 (1961): 429–436.10.1086/287829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]
[6]Kim, J. “On the Logical Conditions of Deductive Explanations.” Philosophy of Science30 (1963): 286–291.10.1086/287943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]
[7]Morgan, C. G. “Kim on Deductive Explanation.” Philosophy of Science37 (1970): 434–439.10.1086/288318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]
[8]Morgan, C. G. “On Two Proposed Models of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science39 (1972): 74–81.10.1086/288411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]
[9]Omer, I. A. “On the D-N Model of Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science37 (1970): 417–433.10.1086/288317CrossRefGoogle Scholar