Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:59:09.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Hasok Chang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A popular and plausible response against Laudan's “pessimistic induction” has been what I call “preservative realism,” which argues that there have actually been enough elements of scientific knowledge preserved through major theory-change processes, and that those elements can be accepted realistically. This paper argues against preservative realism, in particular through a critical review of Psillos's argument concerning the case of the caloric theory of heat. Contrary to his argument, the historical record of the caloric theory reveals that beliefs about the properties of material caloric, rejected by subsequent theories, were indeed central to the successes of the caloric theory. Therefore caloric remains a favorable case for Laudan. Further, I argue that even confirmed cases of preservation do not warrant an inference to truth.

Type
Realism
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 902 - 912
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chang, Hasok (2001), “Spirit, Air, and Quicksilver: The Search for the ‘Real’ Scale of Temperature”, Spirit, Air, and Quicksilver: The Search for the ‘Real’ Scale of Temperature 31:249–284.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok (2002), “Rumford and the Reflection of Radiant Cold: Historical Reflections and Metaphysical Reflexes”, Rumford and the Reflection of Radiant Cold: Historical Reflections and Metaphysical Reflexes 4:127–169.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1975), Against Method. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert (1971), The Caloric Theory of Gases from Lavoisier to Regnault. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1981), “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, A Confutation of Convergent Realism 48:19–49.Google Scholar
Lilley, S. (1948), “Attitudes to the Nature of Heat about the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century”, Attitudes to the Nature of Heat about the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century 1:630–639.Google Scholar
Morris, Robert J. (1972), “Lavoisier and the Caloric Theory”, Lavoisier and the Caloric Theory 6:1–38.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1994), “A Philosophical Study of the Transition from the Caloric Theory of Heat to Thermodynamics: Resisting the Pessimistic Meta-Induction”, A Philosophical Study of the Transition from the Caloric Theory of Heat to Thermodynamics: Resisting the Pessimistic Meta-Induction 25:159–190.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Worrall, John (1989), “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? 43:99–124.Google Scholar