Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:05:48.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Principal Principle and Theories of Chance: Another Bug?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Joshua Haddock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective chance, or the “big bad bug” of David Lewis's account of Humean Supervenience forces, as is well known, is a modification of the Principal Principle. Here, I argue that standard assumptions regarding conditional probabilities entail several puzzling consequences for Lewis's New Principle, namely, an apparent requirement to account for the chance of a theory of chance. These problems, I argue, cannot be adequately answered within the received framework, and so I suggest that an interpretation of conditional probabilities in terms of Alan Hájek's recent work might go some distance toward their resolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 78 , Issue 5 , December 2011 , pp. 854 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank audiences at the 2010 PSA, and the University of Cincinnati; in particular, Doug Keaton, Jon Martin, Tom Polger, Rob Skipper, and Hayden Thornburg.

References

Hájek, Alan. 2003. “What Conditional Probability Could Not Be.” Synthese 137:273–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ned. 1994. “Correcting the Guide to Objective Chance.” Mind 103 (412): 505–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986a. “Introduction.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986b. “Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986c. “A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1994. “Humean Supervenience Debugged.” Mind 103 (412): 473–90.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1999a. “New Work for a Theory of Universals.” In Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1999b. “Reduction of Mind.” In Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Kevin. 2009. “On Background: Using Two-Argument Chance.” Synthese 166:165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar