Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:50:34.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering the Concept of Equilibrium in Classical Statistical Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Janneke van Lith
Janneke van Lith*
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
*
†lnstitute for History and Foundations of Mathematics and Science, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail: j.h.vanlith@phys.uu.nl.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the usual procedure of deriving equilibrium thermodynamics from classical statistical mechanics, Gibbsian fine-grained entropy is taken as the analogue of thermodynamical entropy. However, it is well known that the fine-grained entropy remains constant under the Hamiltonian flow. In this paper it is argued that we need not search for alternatives for fine-grained entropy, nor do we have to reject Hamiltonian dynamics, in order to solve the problem of the constancy of fine-grained entropy and, more generally, to account for the non-equilibrium part of the laws of thermodynamics. Rather, we have to weaken the requirement that equilibrium be identified with a stationary probability distribution.

Type
Foundations of Statistical Physics, Spacetime Theories, and Quantum Field Theory
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 66 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 1999 , 1999 , pp. S107 - S118
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Dennis Dieks and Jos Uffink for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

Callender, Craig (1997), Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics: the Case of Entropy. London: LSE Discussion Paper Series (DP 33/97).Google Scholar
Earman, John and Rédei, Miklós (1996), “Why ergodic theory does not explain the success of equilibrium statistical mechanics”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 47: 79–91.10.1093/bjps/47.1.63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatiana (1956), Die Grundlagen der Thermodynamik. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. Willard (1902), Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, Michael C. (1993), Time's Arrow: The Origins of Thermodynamic Behavior. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sklar, Lawrence (1993), Physics and Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlenbeck, George E. and Ford, George W. (1963), Lectures in Statistical Mechanics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar