Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-n5rmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T23:46:42.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relevance and Redundancy in Deductive Explanations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Peter Gärdenfors
Peter Gärdenfors*
Affiliation:
University of Lund
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 1976 , pp. 420 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ackermann, R. “Deductive Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 32 (1965): 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, R. and Stenner, A. “A Corrected Model of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 33 (1966): 168–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. P. “The Place of the Explanation of Particular Facts in Science.” Philosophy of Science 38 (1971): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, R., Kaplan, D. and Montague, R. “Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 28 (1961): 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. “Explanation Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 28 (1961): 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. “On the Logical Conditions of Deductive Explanations.” Philosophy of Science 30 (1963): 286–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, S. K. “On Omer's Model of Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 39 (1972): 249–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. G. “Kim on Deductive Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1970): 434–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. G. “On Two Proposed Models of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 39 (1972): 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. G. “Omer on Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 40 (1973): 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omer, I. A. “On the D-N Model of Scientific Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 37 (1970): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, D. A. “The Quartercentenary Model of D-N Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 41 (1974): 188–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R. “Deductive Explanation of Scientific Laws.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1972): 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar