Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:42:22.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Kant’s Construction of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Chris Smeenk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 718 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I have benefited from discussions and comments from Michael Friedman and from participating in an American Philosophical Association session along with Konstantin Pollok. I also gratefully acknowledge my debt to Sheldon Smith, for discussions of these and related topics over the last several years and for comments on earlier drafts.

References

Heis, J. 2014. Review of Kant’s Construction of Nature, by Michael Friedman. Philosophical Review 123 (3): 342–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. R. 2013. “Does Kant Have a Pre-Newtonian Picture of Force in the Balance Argument?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 44 (3): 470–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, M. 2014. “Unity for Kant’s Natural Philosophy.” Philosophy of Science 81 (3): 423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar