Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:19:10.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robert Boyle and the Masculine Methods of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Rose-Mary Sargent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In her recent case study, Elizabeth Potter attempts to show how Boyle's experimental method was biased by gender considerations. Part of her argument focuses on the combination of the “invisibility” of women in Boyle's published work together with his unpublished comments on female chastity, and part concerns Boyle's rejection of the animistic explanation of his air pump experiments by Francis Line. I argue that the historical and biographical elements of the case make Potter's arguments questionable. In addition, I address whether and how such historical cases can shed light on current debates about gender issues and argue that Boyle's methodological writings could be used to better advantage in the feminist cause.

Type
Is Methodology Gendered—and Should it be?
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 857 - 867
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, Francis (1874), The Works of Francis Bacon, 14 vols., James Spedding, Robert L. Ellis, and Douglas D. Heath (eds.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert ([1772] 1965), The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, 6 vols., Thomas Birch (ed.). Reprint. Hildesheim, Germany: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (2000), The Works of Robert Boyle, 14 vols., Michael Hunter and Edward B. Davis (eds.). London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Guerrini, Anita (1989), “The Ethics of Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth-Century England”, The Ethics of Animal Experimentation in Seventeenth-Century England 50:391–407.Google ScholarPubMed
Hill, Christopher (1986), “‘A New Kind of Clergy’: Ideology and the Experimental Method”, ‘A New Kind of Clergy’: Ideology and the Experimental Method 16:726–735.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael (2000), Robert Boyle (1627–91): Scrupulosity and Science. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, James R. (1972), “The Ideological Origins of Robert Boyle’s Natural Philosophy”, The Ideological Origins of Robert Boyle’s Natural Philosophy 2:1–21.Google Scholar
Jacob, James R. (1978), “Boyle’s Atomism and the Restoration Assault on Pagan Naturalism”, Boyle’s Atomism and the Restoration Assault on Pagan Naturalism 8:211–233.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (1990), Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Oster, Malcolm (1989), “The ‘Beame of Diuinity’: Animal Suffering in the Early Thought of Robert Boyle”, The ‘Beame of Diuinity’: Animal Suffering in the Early Thought of Robert Boyle 22:151–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinnick, Cassandra L. (1994), “Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science”, Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science 61:646–657.Google Scholar
Potter, Elizabeth (2001), Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Principe, Lawrence M. (1994), “Style and Thought of the Early Boyle: Discovery of the 1648 Manuscript of Seraphic Love”, Style and Thought of the Early Boyle: Discovery of the 1648 Manuscript of Seraphic Love 85:247–260.Google Scholar
Principe, Lawrence M. (1995), “Virtuous Romance and Romantic Virtuoso: The Shaping of Robert Boyle’s Literary Style”, Virtuous Romance and Romantic Virtuoso: The Shaping of Robert Boyle’s Literary Style 56:377–397.Google Scholar
Rolin, Kristina (2000), “Can Gender Ideologies Influence the Practice of the Physical Sciences?”, Can Gender Ideologies Influence the Practice of the Physical Sciences? 7:510–533.Google Scholar
Sargent, Rose-Mary (1995), The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, Rose-Mary (1999), “General Introduction”, in Bacon, Francis, Selected Philosophical Works, Rose-Mary Sargent (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, vi–xxxvi.Google Scholar
Sargent, Rose-Mary (2003), “Constructing Boyle’s Gender Politics” (review of Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases by Elizabeth Potter), Metascience 12:113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar