Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:10:22.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

S. S. Stevens and the Origins of Operationism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Gary L. Hardcastle
Gary L. Hardcastle*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite influencing the social sciences since the 1930s, S. S. Stevens' “operationist” philosophy of science has yet to be adequately understood. I reconstruct Stevens' operationism from his early work and assess the influence of various views (logical positivism, behaviorism and the “operational viewpoint” of P. W. Bridgman, among others) on Stevens. Stevens' operationism emerges, on my reconstruction, as a naturalistic methodological directive aimed at agreement, founded in turn on the belief that agreement is constitutive of science, the scientific community, and objectivity. Further, I show that operationism is historically and philosophically independent of the views mentioned above.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 404 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I thank I. B. Cohen, Valerie Gray Hardcastle, Gerald Holton, Deborah Mayo, Bert Moyer, Alan Richardson, Fred Suppe, W. v. O. Quine, Maila Walter, Sheldon White, the staff of the Harvard University Archives, and audiences at Virginia Tech and M.I.T. for comments, assistance, and discussion of this topic. I am particularly grateful to Michelle Little for research assistance, and to Geraldine Stevens for gracious aid and discussion. Support for the work leading to this paper was provided by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and the Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology at M.I.T.

‡

Address requests for reprints to the author at garyh@vt.edu or Department of Philosophy 0126, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0126.

References

Benjamin, A. C. (1955), Operationism. Springfield, IL: Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1923), “Intelligence as the Tests Test It”, New Republic 35: 34–37.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1933), The Physical Dimensions of Consciousness. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1945), “The Use of Operational Definitions in Science”, The Psychological Review 52: 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1950), A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd Edition. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1927), The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W. (1934), “A Physicist's Second Reaction to Mengenlehre”, Scripta Mathematica 2: 101–117 and 224–234.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934a), “On the Character of Philosophic Problems”, Philosophy of Science 1: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1934b), “The Rejection of Metaphysics”, Psyche: An Annual of General and Linguistic Psychology 14: 100–111.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1937), The Logical Syntax of Language. Translated by Smeaton, Amethe. Originally published as Logische Syntax der Sprache (Vienna: Springer). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar
Creath, R. (1987), “The Initial Reception of Carnap's Doctrine of Analyticity”, Nous 21: 477–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H. (1934), “A Logical Analysis of the Psycho-Physical Problem”, Philosophy of Science 1: 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1954), “A Logical Appraisal of Operationism”, The Scientific Monthly 79: 215–220.Google Scholar
Hornstein, G. A. (1988), “Quantifying Psychological Phenomena: Debates, Dilemmas, and Implications”, in Morawski, J. G. (ed.), The Rise of Experimentation in American Psychology. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. S. (1992), “The Naturalists Return”, The Philosophical Review 101: 53–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, S. (1992), “Psychology's Bridgman vs. Bridgman's Bridgman: An Essay in Reconstruction”, Theory and Psychology 2: 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. (ed.) (1994), Naturalizing Epistemology, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, B. (1977), The Rise of American Philosophy: Cambridge, Massachusetts 1860–1930. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leahey, T. H. (1980), “The Myth of Operationism”, The Journal of Mind and Behavior 1: 127–143.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1929), Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1934), “Experience and Meaning”, Philosophical Review: 125ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. F. (1921), Psychology of the Other-One. Columbia, MO.: Missouri Book Company.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. E. (1991), “P.W. Bridgman's Operational Perspective on Physics. Part I: Origins and Development” and “Part II: Refinements, Publications, and Reception”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 22: 237–258 and 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, T. B. (1989), “Operationism in Psychology: A Discussion of Contextual Antecedents and an Historical Interpretation of Its Longevity”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 23: 139–153.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1945), “The Operational Analysis of Psychological Terms” and “Rejoinders and Second Thoughts”, Psychological Review 52: 270–277, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. D. (1986), Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1935a), “The Operational Basis of Psychology” (discussion), American Journal of Psychology 47: 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1935b), “The Operational Definition of Psychological Concepts”, Psychological Review 42: 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1936), “Psychology: The Propaedeutic Science”, Philosophy of Science 3: 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1939), “Psychology and the Science of Science”, Psychological Bulletin 36: 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1942/1983), “Operationism”, Runes, D. D., (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy (Revised and Enlarged). Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 235–236.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1947), “Psychological Operationism”, Encyclopedia Britannica, 14th Edition. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1951), “Mathematics, Measurement and Psychophysics”, in Stevens, S. S., (ed.), S. S. Stevens, New York: Wiley, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1958), “Measurement and Man”, Science Feb. 21, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1959), “The Quantification of Sensation”, Daedalus 88: 606–621.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1966a), “Quantifying the Sensory Experience”, in Feyerabend, P. K. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Mind, Matter, and Method: Essays in Philosophy and Science in Honor of Herbert Feigl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 215–233.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1966b), “Operations or Words?”, Psychological Monographs 627: 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1966c), “On the Operation Known as Judgment”, American Scientist 54: 385–401.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1968), “E. G. Boring”, American Journal of Psychology 81: 589–606.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1974), “S. S. Stevens”, in Lindzey, G., (ed.), G. Lindzey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, pp. 395–420.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1932), Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Century.Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1935), “Psychology versus Immediate Experience”, Philosophy of Science 2: 356–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, M. L. (1990). Science and Cultural Crisis: An Intellectual Biography of Percy Williams Bridgman (1882–1961). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, W. R. (1990), “Stanley Smith Stevens”, in Holmes, F. L. et. al., (eds.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography Volume XVIII (Supplement II), pp. 869–875.Google Scholar