No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
In a recent paper, Sahotra Sarkar compares the Standard Dynamical interpretation of natural selection with the Information-Theoretic interpretation from Steven A. Frank. I address Sarkar’s three arguments against Frank’s interpretation. I show that Sarkar’s major argument that a key component of Frank’s account “does not have any natural biological interpretation” is premised on a contradiction stemming from a mathematical error. Consequently, Sarkar’s major argument is unsound. I also address Sarkar’s claim that a central equation in Frank’s interpretation is dynamically insufficient and his claim that Frank’s interpretation uses nonintuitive parameters to simply rewrite familiar results.
Thanks to Samir Okasha and two anonymous referees for helpful discussion and comments. This work was supported by the European Research Council Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013), ERC grant 295449.