Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:53:10.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Barbara L. Horan
Barbara L. Horan*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy University of Maryland
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper takes a critical look at the idea that evolutionary theory is a statistical theory. It argues that despite the strong instrumental motivation for statistical theories, they are not necessary to explain deterministic systems. Biological evolution is fundamentally a result of deterministic processes. Hence, a statistical theory is not necessary for describing the evolutionary forces of genetic drift and natural selection, nor is it needed for describing the fitness of organisms. There is a computational advantage to the statistical theory of population genetics, but population genetics succeeds only by eliminating causes from its account of evolutionary change.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 76 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Many people have read earlier versions of this paper and/or have made valuable suggestions. Special thanks go to Henry Byerly, Nancy Cartwright, John Dupré, David Hilbert, David Hull, Wilbur Knorr, Robert Richardson, Alex Rosenberg, Robert Rynasiewicz, Merrilee Salmon, Abner Shimony, Elliott Sober, Patrick Suppes, Ken Waters and Jim Woodward. Chuang Liu and Niall Shanks were especially helpful in answering questions about quantum theory.

References

Beatty, J. (1984), “Chance and Natural Selection”, Philosophy of Science 51: 183–211.10.1086/289177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R. (1978), “Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9: 181–206.10.1016/0039-3681(78)90005-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R. (1990), Adaptation and Environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. and Beatty, J. (1984), “The Propensity Interpretation of ‘Fitness’: No Interpretation is No Substitute”, Philosophy of Science 51: 342–347.10.1086/289184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burian, R. (1984), “Adaptation”, in Grene, M. (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism: Themes and Counterthemes in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
Caws, P. (1963), “Science, Computers, and the Complexity of Nature”, Philosophy of Science 30: 158–164.10.1086/287926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, A. (1940), “On the Concept of a Random Sequence”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 46: 130–135.10.1090/S0002-9904-1940-07154-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffa, J. A. (1972), “Randomness and Knowledge”, in Schaffner, K. F. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.), PSA 1972. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 103–115.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. (1990), “The Explanatory Tools of Theoretical Population Biology”, in Fine, A., Forbes, M., and Wessels, L. (eds.), PSA 1990, vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 165–178.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1987), The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1986), A Primer on Determinism. Boston: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-9072-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, G.; Lavine, S.; and Albert, D. (1992), “Knowledge of the Past and Future”, Journal of Philosophy 89: 607–642.10.2307/2940898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1947), The Design of Experiments. 4th ed. New York: Hafner Publishing.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1958), The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. 2d ed. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Giere, R. (1973), “Objective Single-Case Probabilities and the Foundations of Statistics”, in Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A., and Moisil, G. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, vol. 4. New York: American Elsevier, pp. 467–483.Google Scholar
Griesemer, J. (1991), “Horan on the Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory”, delivered to the Pacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, San Francisco, 28 April 1991.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1965), The Logic of Statistical Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316534960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1990), The Taming of Chance. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartl, D. (1980), Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Hellman, G. (1978), “Randomness and Reality”, in Asquith, P. D. and Hacking, I. (eds.), PSA 1978, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 79–95.Google Scholar
Horan, B. (Forthcoming), Optimality Models in Evolutionary Biology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. (1974), The Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. (1978), “Is Physical Randomness Just Indeterminism in Disguise?” in P. D. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.), PSA 1978, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 98–113.Google Scholar
Lewin, R. (1985), Genes. 2d ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1974), The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1985), “Population Genetics”, in Greenwood, P., Harvey, P., and Slatkin, M. (eds.), Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963), Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674865327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1975), Evolution and the Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, S. and Beatty, J. (1979), “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness”, Philosophy of Science 46: 263–286.10.1086/288865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. (1988), “What Does Natural Selection Explain? Correction of Sober”, Philosophy of Science 55: 422–426.10.1086/289446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1877), “The Fixation of Belief”, Popular Science Monthly 12: 1–15.Google Scholar
Provine, W. (1986), Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1949), The Theory of Probability: An Inquiry into the Logical and Mathematical Foundation of the Calculus of Probability. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1985), The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1988), “Is the Theory of Natural Selection a Statistical Theory?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy (suppl.) 14: 187–207.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1973), The Philosophy of Biology. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1988), Philosophy of Biology Today. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, M. (1982), Philosophy and Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1980), “Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism”, Philosophy of Science 47: 350–383.10.1086/288942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1990), “Let's Razor Occam's Razor”, in Knowles, D. (ed.), Explanation and Its Limits. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–93.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. and Kitcher, P. K. (1988), “Return of the Gene”, Journal of Philosophy 85: 339–361.10.2307/2026953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1983), “Arguments for Randomizing”, in Asquith, P. and Nickles, T. (eds.), PSA 1982, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 464–475.Google Scholar
Van den Berghe, E. and Gross, M. (1989), “Natural Selection Resulting from Female Breeding Competition in a Pacific Salmon (Coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch)”, Evolution 43: 125–140.Google Scholar
von Mises, R. (1964), Mathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Waters, K. (1986), “Natural Selection Without Survival of the Fittest”, Biology and Philosophy 1: 207–225.10.1007/BF00142902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1979), “Scientific Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30: 41–67.10.1093/bjps/30.1.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woozley, A. (1964), “Introduction”, in J. Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: New American Library, pp. i–xxxii.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1921), “Correlation and Causation”, Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 557–585.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1931), “Statistical Theory of Evolution”, Journal of the American Statistical Association (suppl.) 26: 201–208.10.2307/2277618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1942), “Statistical Genetics and Evolution”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 48: 223–246.10.1090/S0002-9904-1942-07641-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar