Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:14:36.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Strategy for Planning Basic Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

T. J. Gordon  and
M. J. Raffensperger
T. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
M. J. Raffensperger
Affiliation:
University of California at Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scientific tradition holds that it is essential to permit individual researchers almost complete freedom in their selection of research projects. As a result, structured research planning has not played a major role in determining the course of the sciences. By “structural research planning” we mean the methodical establishment of goals, and the identification of research routines which apparently accord priority to highest value goals, while minimizing the cost and time of their attainment. With increasing competition for limited fiscal and intellectual resources this kind of planning may become more necessary. Let us cite three specific examples: First, the individual researcher is often faced with the question of how best to spend his time in pursuing a particular line of investigation. He must allocate his personal resources of time and talent to work which appears to hold the promise of highest pay-off. Second, on a larger scale, the competition for resources also raises the question of priority among alternative government-sponsored research projects. Individuals proposing equally alluring projects sometimes seek the same funds; government planners need some sort of objective criteria (hopefully based on a rational strategy) in order to judge the proposals. Furthermore, government planners face the problem of justifying their request for “big science” resources; a planning strategy which defines the use and expected output of the requested resources can help in the design and promotion of their concept. Finally, there is a growing sentiment that at least some research should be directed toward the solution of current and anticipated societal problems, to find means of circumventing or minimizing the impact of potentially dangerous problems of civilization. These needs : the choice of individual research, allocation of national resources among competing projects, and selecting research of societal importance, suggest that structured research planning might be valuable.

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1969 , pp. 205 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bunge, M., Foundations of Physics, Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Churchman, C. W., et al., Introduction to Operations Research, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[3] Dalkey, N., and Helmer, O., “An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of exports,” Management Science, vol. 9, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Dean, B., “Stochastic networks in research planning,” in Research Program Effectiveness (ed. M. C. Yovits, et al.), Gordon and Breach, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[5] Helmer, O., and Rescher, N., The Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences, The Rand Corporation, 1960.Google Scholar
[6] Jantsch, E., Technological Forecasting in Perspective, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1967.Google Scholar
[7] Kean, D. W., Science, vol. 1, 1967, p. 1134.Google Scholar
[8] Kistiakowsky, G. B., “On federal support of basic research,” Basic Research and National Goals, National Academy of Science, 1965.Google Scholar
[9] Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.Google Scholar
[10] “The National Science Foundation, its present and future,” The National Science Foundation, 1967.Google Scholar
[11] Zwicky, F., Morphology of Propulsive Power, Society for Morphological Research, Pasadena, 1962.Google Scholar