Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:14:50.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tense and Indeterminateness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Simon Saunders
Simon Saunders*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Sub-faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton St., Oxford OX1 4JJ, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Is tense real and objective? Can the fact that something is past, say, be wholly objective, consistent with modern physics? I believe that it can. But some hold that for tense to be real, then a certain ontological doctrine must also hold. There must be a fact of the matter as to what really, truly, exists at each time. For example, it is held that only what is now really exists. This is the doctrine of presentism. Alternatively, that only what is now or past really exists; following Savitt, I shall call this possibilism. But on either view there is a problem with special relativity.

Type
Philosophy of Physics and Chemistry
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S600 - S611
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. (1993), The Undivided Universe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (this volume), “Shedding Light on Time”.Google Scholar
Clifton, R. and Hogarth, M. (1995), “The Definability of Objective Becoming in Minkowski Spacetime”, Synthese 103: 355–387.10.1007/BF01089733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, D. (1985), “Quantum Theory as a Universal Physical Theory”, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24: 1–41.10.1007/BF00670071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diósi, L., Gisin, N., Halliwell, J., and Percival, I. C. (1995), Physical Review Letters 74: 203.10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, R. (1995), “Stochastically Branching Spacetime Topology”, in Savitt, S. (ed.), Time's Arrow Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–188.10.1017/CBO9780511622861.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowker, F. and Kent, A. (1996), “On the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics”, Journal of Statistical Physics 82: 1575–1646.10.1007/BF02183396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1973), Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, Ch. 10. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XII. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-2622-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinchliff, M. (this volume), “Relativity, Spacetimes, and the Present”.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1983), “A Subjectivist's Guide to Objective Chance”, in Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–132.Google Scholar
Maxwell, N. (1985), “Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?”, Philosophy of Science 52: 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, S. (1994), A Model of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pearle, P. (1990), “Towards a Relativistic Theory of Statevector Reduction”, in Miller, A. (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty. New York: Plenum Press, 193–214.10.1007/978-1-4684-8771-8_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (1967), “Time and Physical Geometry”, Journal of Philosophy 64: 240–247. Reprinted in H. Putnam (1975), Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198–205.10.2307/2024493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. (1995), “Time, Quantum Mechanics and Decoherence”, Synthese 102: 235–266.10.1007/BF01089802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. (1996a) “Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Tense”, Synthese 107: 19–53.10.1007/BF00413901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. (1996b), “Relativism”, in Clifton, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 125–142.10.1007/978-94-015-8656-6_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. (1998a), “Hertz's Principles”, in Baird, D. et al. (eds.), Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 123–154.10.1007/978-94-015-8855-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. (1998b), “Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Probability”, Synthese 114: 373–404.10.1023/A:1005079904008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. (1968), “On Einstein-Minkowski Space-time”, Journal of Philosophy 65: 5–23.10.2307/2024512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. (1991), “On Relativity Theory and the Openness of the Future”, Philosophy of Science 58: 147–167.10.1086/289609CrossRefGoogle Scholar